← Back

Comparison Console

Acebeam E10 2.0 vs Acebeam EC35 Gen II

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Acebeam EC35 Gen II stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam E10 2.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam E10 2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Acebeam E10 2.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Acebeam EC35 Gen II stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Acebeam EC35 Gen II stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Acebeam E10 2.0 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Acebeam EC35 Gen II stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Acebeam E10 2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Acebeam E10 2.0 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 93% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Acebeam EC35 Gen II stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 1400% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Acebeam E10 2.0 — Beam distance: 715 m (2346 ft)Acebeam E10 2.0 — Max candela: 127806 cdAcebeam E10 2.0 — Weight: 106.5 g (3.76 oz)Acebeam E10 2.0 — Length: 88 mm (3.46 in)Acebeam E10 2.0 — Retail price: US$59.9Acebeam E10 2.0 — Impact resistance: 1.5 m (5 ft)Acebeam EC35 Gen II — Beam distance: 180 m (591 ft)Acebeam EC35 Gen II — Max candela: 8100 cdAcebeam EC35 Gen II — Weight: 84.8 g (2.99 oz)Acebeam EC35 Gen II — Length: 138.7 mm (5.46 in)Acebeam EC35 Gen II — Retail price: US$66.9Acebeam EC35 Gen II — Impact resistance: 1 m (3 ft)Beam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceImpact resistance
Price & carry
Retail price
US$59.9Cheapest
US$66.9Most expensive
Weight
106.5 g (3.76 oz)Heaviest
84.8 g (2.99 oz)Lightest
Length
88 mm (3.46 in)Shortest
138.7 mm (5.46 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
1200 lmHighest output
1100 lmLowest output
Max candela
127806 cdHighest candela
8100 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
715 m (2346 ft)Highest
180 m (591 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
7200 minShortest runtime
108000 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1x 16340 Li-ion rechargeable (USB-C)
1x 18650 rechargeable Li-ion battery (compatible with 2x CR123 batteries)
Charging type
USB-C on battery
USB Type-C charging port
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IPX68 (2 meters submersible)
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)Highest
1 m (3 ft)Lowest
Material
Aerospace-grade AL6061-T6 aluminum with hard-anodized finish
Aerospace-grade aluminum body with military grade type III hard-anodized finish
Use case profile
Best for
Long-range throw in compact EDCEveryday carryHikingCampingEmergency useHands-free operation with magnetic tail
Everyday carryCompact lightweight useOne-handed operation
Common praise
Exceptional long-range focused beam for its sizeCompact and pocket-friendly designDurable aerospace-grade aluminum constructionMagnetic tail for hands-free useSmooth one-handed operation with side switch
Very reliableGood USB-C charging speedCompact and lightweight for EDC
Common complaints
Short turbo runtime requiring frequent rechargingBattery size may limit runtime compared to larger batteries
Somewhat dated design