← Back

Comparison Console

Acebeam E70-AL vs Olight Warrior Mini 3

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Acebeam E70-AL stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam E70-AL stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam E70-AL stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 163% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Acebeam E70-AL stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Acebeam E70-AL stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 62% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Acebeam E70-AL stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 163% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Acebeam E70-AL stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 41% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 70% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Acebeam E70-AL — Weight: 102 g (3.60 oz)Acebeam E70-AL — Length: 128.3 mm (5.05 in)Acebeam E70-AL — Retail price: US$74.9Acebeam E70-AL — Impact resistance: 1 m (3 ft)Acebeam E70-AL — Max lumens: 4600 lmAcebeam E70-AL — Max runtime: 15840 minOlight Warrior Mini 3 — Weight: 105 g (3.70 oz)Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Length: 106.5 mm (4.19 in)Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Retail price: US$87.95Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Impact resistance: 1.5 m (5 ft)Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Max lumens: 1750 lmOlight Warrior Mini 3 — Max runtime: 27000 minWeightLengthRetail priceImpact resistanceMax lumensMax runtime
Price & carry
Retail price
US$74.9Cheapest
US$87.95Most expensive
Weight
102 g (3.60 oz)Lightest
105 g (3.70 oz)Heaviest
Length
128.3 mm (5.05 in)Longest
106.5 mm (4.19 in)Shortest
Output
Max lumens
4600 lmHighest output
1750 lmLowest output
Max candela
14400 cd
14400 cd
Beam distance
240 m (787 ft)
240 m (787 ft)
Max runtime
15840 minShortest runtime
27000 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1 x 21700 lithium-ion
1*18650 rechargeable lithium-ion
Charging type
USB-C built-in port on battery, cable included
Proprietary magnetic MCC3 charging cable
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68 (2 meters submersible)
IPX8
Impact resistance
1 m (3 ft)Lowest
1.5 m (5 ft)Highest
Material
Aero grade aluminum, HAIII hard-anodized
Aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
EDCCampingAdventureSearch-and-rescueOutdoor enthusiastsSecurityIndustrial applications
EDCTactical useSelf-defenseOutdoors lighting
Common praise
High max output of 4600 lumensGood build quality with premium materialsConvenient rechargeable 21700 battery with USB-CIncludes useful accessories like pouch, spare O-rings, lanyardSolid runtime and throw performanceFeatures tritium slots for customization
High output lumens for sizeSolid build qualityDual switches for tactical and daily useIPX8 waterproof ratingMagnetic charging convenience
Common complaints
Inner sleeve color (blue) not matching brand colorsTube size causes slight rattle with flat top 21700 cellsTailcap not easily removable to charge batteryMode memory cannot be disabled
Minor size reduction from previous model may affect grip comfortNo increase in max output from previous generationTail switch complexity may require learning curve