← Back

Comparison Console

Acebeam EC50 Gen III vs Acebeam PT40

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Acebeam EC50 Gen III stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam EC50 Gen III stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam EC50 Gen III stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Acebeam EC50 Gen III stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Acebeam PT40 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Acebeam EC50 Gen III stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Acebeam PT40 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 21% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Acebeam PT40 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Acebeam EC50 Gen III stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Acebeam PT40 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 93% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Acebeam EC50 Gen III stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 1400% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Acebeam EC50 Gen III — Beam distance: 326 m (1070 ft)Acebeam EC50 Gen III — Max candela: 26500 cdAcebeam EC50 Gen III — Weight: 120 g (4.23 oz)Acebeam EC50 Gen III — Length: 132 mm (5.20 in)Acebeam EC50 Gen III — Retail price: US$129.9Acebeam EC50 Gen III — Impact resistance: 1.2 m (4 ft)Acebeam PT40 — Beam distance: 121 m (397 ft)Acebeam PT40 — Max candela: 3680 cdAcebeam PT40 — Weight: 145 g (5.11 oz)Acebeam PT40 — Length: 126.8 mm (4.99 in)Acebeam PT40 — Retail price: US$175Acebeam PT40 — Impact resistance: 1 m (3 ft)Beam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceImpact resistance
Price & carry
Retail price
US$129.9Cheapest
US$175Most expensive
Weight
120 g (4.23 oz)Lightest
145 g (5.11 oz)Heaviest
Length
132 mm (5.20 in)Longest
126.8 mm (4.99 in)Shortest
Output
Max lumens
3850 lmHighest output
3000 lmLowest output
Max candela
26500 cdHighest candela
3680 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
326 m (1070 ft)Highest
121 m (397 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
72000 minLongest runtime
4800 minShortest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1 x 26650 Li-ion rechargeable
18650 rechargeable Li-ion
Charging type
USB charging cable included
Micro USB (via included cable, optional battery with USB-C port)
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX8 (2 meters)
IP68
Impact resistance
1.2 m (4 ft)Highest
1 m (3 ft)Lowest
Material
Aircraft grade aluminium with premium Type III hard-anodized anti-abrasive finish
A6061-T6 aluminium alloy with Type III hard-anodized finish
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry (EDC)▣Hiking▣Camping▣Outdoor Use▣Professional Use
▣Industrial Work▣Vehicle Repair▣Camping▣Outdoor Sports▣Law Enforcement▣Everyday Carry
Common praise
✓High Max Output And Excellent Beam Pattern From Cree Xhp70.2 LED✓Compact Size And Lightweight Design (120g) Suitable For Everyday Carry✓Integrated Charging And Simple Ui With Side Switch✓Good Beam Distance And Throw For Outdoor Tasks✓Durable Construction With Hard Anodized Finish
✓High Brightness And Good Beam Quality✓Versatile Mounting Options Including Magnetic Tail And Pocket Clip✓High Color Rendering Index Reducing Eye Strain✓Solid Build Quality With Aircraft Grade Aluminum Body
Common complaints
⚠No Explicit Complaints From Provided Sources
⚠Magnet Not Very Strong On Curved Metal Surfaces⚠Headband Attachment Not Very Comfortable For Switching Between Handheld And Headlamp Use⚠Pocket Clip Is Not Very Stiff And Less Comfortable To Clip Onto Pockets

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online