← Back

Comparison Console

Acebeam G10 vs Olight Warrior Mini 3

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Acebeam G10 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative. Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative. Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 192% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Acebeam G10 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Acebeam G10 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 21% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Acebeam G10 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 66% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 192% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Acebeam G10 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 100% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 38471% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Acebeam G10 — Beam distance: 200 m (656 ft)Acebeam G10 — Max candela: 10000 cdAcebeam G10 — Weight: 87 g (3.07 oz)Acebeam G10 — Length: 68.3 mm (2.69 in)Acebeam G10 — Retail price: US$89.9Acebeam G10 — Max lumens: 600 lmOlight Warrior Mini 3 — Beam distance: 240 m (787 ft)Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Max candela: 14400 cdOlight Warrior Mini 3 — Weight: 105 g (3.70 oz)Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Length: 106.5 mm (4.19 in)Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Retail price: US$87.95Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Max lumens: 1750 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$89.9Most expensive
US$87.95Cheapest
Weight
87 g (3.07 oz)Lightest
105 g (3.70 oz)Heaviest
Length
68.3 mm (2.69 in)Shortest
106.5 mm (4.19 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
600 lmLowest output
1750 lmHighest output
Max candela
10000 cdLowest candela
14400 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
200 m (656 ft)Lowest
240 m (787 ft)Highest
Max runtime
70 minShortest runtime
27000 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
16340 USB-C rechargeable lithium-ion, compatible with CR123A
1*18650 rechargeable lithium-ion
Charging type
USB Type-C
Proprietary magnetic MCC3 charging cable
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68 (2m/30min)
IPX8
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)
1.5 m (5 ft)
Material
HAIII anodized A6061-T6 aluminum alloy
Aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
Tactical useRail-mounted applicationsUsers needing quick attach/detach without toolsUse on Glock and Picatinny rails
EDCTactical useSelf-defenseOutdoors lighting
Common praise
Compact and lightweight designQuick attach and release rail mountHigh output and long throw for its sizeAmbidextrous and stealthy switchDurable construction with high IP rating
High output lumens for sizeSolid build qualityDual switches for tactical and daily useIPX8 waterproof ratingMagnetic charging convenience
Common complaints
Short maximum runtime of 70 minutesLimited to rail-mounted use, not a general handheldLimited information on mode spacing and user interface
Minor size reduction from previous model may affect grip comfortNo increase in max output from previous generationTail switch complexity may require learning curve