Comparison Console
Acebeam H17 2.0 vs Nitecore NU25 UL
EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Nitecore NU25 UL stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative. Nitecore NU25 UL stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam H17 2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 400% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Nitecore NU25 UL stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.
Acebeam H17 2.0 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 62% gap from the closest alternative.
Nitecore NU25 UL stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.
Acebeam H17 2.0 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 62% gap from the closest alternative.
Nitecore NU25 UL stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 80% gap from the closest alternative.
Acebeam H17 2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 400% gap from the closest alternative.
Nitecore NU25 UL stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 74% gap from the closest alternative.
Acebeam H17 2.0 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 278% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$60Most expensive
US$37Cheapest
Weight
73 g (2.57 oz)Heaviest
45 g (1.59 oz)Lightest
Length
79 mm (3.11 in)Longest
60.1 mm (2.37 in)Shortest
Output
Max lumens
2000 lmHighest output
400 lmLowest output
Max candela
4096 cdHighest candela
1029 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
128 m (420 ft)Highest
64 m (210 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
10200 minLongest runtime
2700 minShortest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
18350 USB-C Lithium-ion rechargeable battery
Built-in 650mAh Li-ion
Charging type
USB-C, 5V 1.5A fast charging, about 1 hour full charge
USB-C (~1.5 hours)
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68 (2 meters submersible for 30 minutes)
IP66
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)Highest
1 m (3 ft)Lowest
Material
Aerospace-grade AL6061-T6 aluminum alloy with HAIII hard-anodized anti-abrasive and corrosion-resistant finish
ABS plastic
Use case profile
Best for
Night running and joggingCamping and hikingOutdoor work and repairsTactical and emergency useEveryday carry for high-CRI lighting needs
Ultralight hikingBackpackingTrail runningAlpine climbingNighttime outdoor activities
Common praise
High CRI 4000K neutral white LEDs provide natural, comfortable light suitable for long useCompact and lightweight design (73g) with included rechargeable 18350 batteryFast USB-C charging with full charge in about 1 hourMultiple modes including six brightness levels, strobe, SOS, beacon, and stepless dimmingDurable aerospace-grade aluminum body with excellent waterproof and impact resistanceConvenient magnetic tailcap and versatile clip for many carry optionsVery long runtime in moonlight mode (up to 170 hours)
Exceptional lightweight at 45g with good outputVersatile dual-beam (spot and flood) optionsAccurate and long runtimes especially ultralow modeFast USB-C charging (~1.5 hours)Comfortable and secure lightweight strapIP66 weatherproofing for rugged outdoor useClear battery level indicators
Common complaints
Turbo runtime on max output limited to about 30 seconds before stepping downNo detailed specification for exact switch type in sourcesNot suitable for users requiring very long maximum output turbo runtime without steps down
Red light mode is too bright and lacks dimming optionsNon-replaceable built-in battery limits long-term maintenanceUser interface is complex and requires reading the manualShock cord strap may not suit users preferring traditional padded bandsBattery capacity modest for extended multi-week trips
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online