← Back

Comparison Console

Acebeam H17 2.0 vs Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative. Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative. Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Acebeam H17 2.0 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Acebeam H17 2.0 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Acebeam H17 2.0 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Acebeam H17 2.0 stands out as the shortest option for length, with about a 29% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the longest option for length, with about a 42% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Acebeam H17 2.0 — Beam distance: 128 m (420 ft)Acebeam H17 2.0 — Max candela: 4096 cdAcebeam H17 2.0 — Weight: 73 g (2.57 oz)Acebeam H17 2.0 — Length: 79 mm (3.11 in)Acebeam H17 2.0 — Retail price: US$59.9Acebeam H17 2.0 — Impact resistance: 1.5 m (5 ft)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Beam distance: 215 m (705 ft)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Max candela: 11525 cdSofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Weight: 71 g (2.50 oz)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Length: 112 mm (4.41 in)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Retail price: US$56Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Impact resistance: 1 m (3 ft)Beam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceImpact resistance
Price & carry
Retail price
US$59.9Most expensive
US$56Cheapest
Weight
73 g (2.57 oz)Heaviest
71 g (2.50 oz)Lightest
Length
79 mm (3.11 in)Shortest
112 mm (4.41 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
2000 lmLowest output
2100 lmHighest output
Max candela
4096 cdLowest candela
11525 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
128 m (420 ft)Lowest
215 m (705 ft)Highest
Max runtime
10200 min
Unknown
Power & durability
Battery type
1x 18350 Li-ion rechargeable battery
1x 18650 3.7v unprotected lithium battery (included)
Charging type
USB-C (5V 1.5A)
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IP66
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)Highest
1 m (3 ft)Lowest
Material
AL6061-T6 aluminum alloy with HAIII hard-anodized finish
Aluminum
Use case profile
Best for
Night runningOutdoor adventuresCampingHands-free tasks
HuntingGeneral outdoor useEDCCampingHikingFishing
Common praise
High max brightness and useful moonlight modeLightweight at 73g without headbandFast USB-C charging in about 1 hourVersatile modes including strobe, SOS, beacon and RGB auxiliary lightsDurable aluminum body with IP68 waterproofing and impact resistance
High sustained brightnessGood balance of price and featuresVersatile beam types (spot, flood, red)Lightweight and compact for a triple channel headlampUSB-C charging convenientRegulated output for stable brightness
Common complaints
Run time on turbo mode is limited to under an hourSome users might find headlamp attachment methods or weight with headband less suitable for everyday carry
No glass lens protection (optic exposed)Magnet weak on thin metalLacks lanyard attachment includedTailcap design hinders flat tailstanding with lanyard attached

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online