← Back

Comparison Console

Acebeam K75 V2.0 vs ThruNite TN42

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

ThruNite TN42 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 43% gap from the closest alternative. ThruNite TN42 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 44% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam K75 V2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 34% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

ThruNite TN42 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 44% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Acebeam K75 V2.0 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 78% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

ThruNite TN42 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 43% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Acebeam K75 V2.0 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 76% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

ThruNite TN42 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Acebeam K75 V2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 34% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

ThruNite TN42 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 97% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Acebeam K75 V2.0 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 3318% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Acebeam K75 V2.0 — Beam distance: 2716 m (8911 ft)Acebeam K75 V2.0 — Max candela: 1844164 cdAcebeam K75 V2.0 — Weight: 1140 g (40.21 oz)Acebeam K75 V2.0 — Length: 213.6 mm (8.41 in)Acebeam K75 V2.0 — Retail price: US$489.95Acebeam K75 V2.0 — Max lumens: 6500 lmThruNite TN42 — Beam distance: 1860 m (6102 ft)ThruNite TN42 — Max candela: 864000 cdThruNite TN42 — Weight: 648 g (22.86 oz)ThruNite TN42 — Length: 190.5 mm (7.50 in)ThruNite TN42 — Retail price: US$275ThruNite TN42 — Max lumens: 4848 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$489.95Most expensive
US$275Cheapest
Weight
1140 g (40.21 oz)Heaviest
648 g (22.86 oz)Lightest
Length
213.6 mm (8.41 in)Longest
190.5 mm (7.50 in)Shortest
Output
Max lumens
6500 lmHighest output
4848 lmLowest output
Max candela
1844164 cdHighest candela
864000 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
2716 m (8911 ft)Highest
1860 m (6102 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
10800 minLongest runtime
316 minShortest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
4 x 18650 lithium-ion
4x 21700 rechargeable lithium-ion batteries (parallel configuration)
Charging type
External charger (batteries must be removed)
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IPX8 (2 meters)
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)
1.5 m (5 ft)
Material
Aluminium Alloy
Aluminum, hard anodized
Use case profile
Best for
▣Search And Rescue▣Long Range Outdoor Use▣Industrial Applications▣Professional Grade Illumination
▣Search And Rescue▣Long Distance Throw▣Outdoor Activities Requiring High Output And Long Range
Common praise
✓Extreme Throw Distance✓High Maximum Output✓Professional Build Quality✓Multiple Runtime Modes✓Intelligent Temperature Control
✓Very High Max Output Of 4848 Lumens With Excellent Long Throw Capability (1860 Meters).✓Good Build Quality With Hard Anodized Aluminum And Tight Threading.✓Simple And Intuitive E Switch User Interface With Mode Memory.✓Included Accessories Like Shoulder Strap And USB C Charger.✓No Visible Or Audible Pwm.✓Battery Runtime Up To Approximately 5 Hours And 16 Minutes At Firefly Mode For 180 Days.✓Good Thermal Performance With Predictable Step Down After 2 Minutes On Turbo.
Common complaints
⚠Heavy Weight Making Long Handheld Use Tiring⚠Requires External Charging Of Batteries⚠Large Size Not Suited For Pocket Carry
⚠No Thermal Regulation, Causing Step Down Due To Heat After Turbo Mode.⚠Threads Are Somewhat Difficult To Start Or Unscrew.⚠Heats Up Significantly On Turbo/high Modes Making Prolonged Handheld Use Uncomfortable.⚠Limited Retention Options, Some Users Find Shoulder Strap Front Mount Flimsy.⚠Low Voltage Protection Is Not Fully Clear; Caution Advised With Unprotected Cells.⚠Large Size And Weight (over 600 Grams Without Batteries) Makes Compact Carry Difficult.

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online