← Back

Comparison Console

Acebeam L35 2.0 vs Olight Seeker 4 Pro

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam L35 2.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam L35 2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Acebeam L35 2.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Acebeam L35 2.0 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Acebeam L35 2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 100% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Acebeam L35 2.0 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 28700% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Acebeam L35 2.0 — Beam distance: 650 m (2133 ft)Acebeam L35 2.0 — Max candela: 105625 cdAcebeam L35 2.0 — Weight: 250 g (8.82 oz)Acebeam L35 2.0 — Length: 152 mm (5.98 in)Acebeam L35 2.0 — Retail price: US$114.9Acebeam L35 2.0 — Impact resistance: 1 m (3 ft)Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Beam distance: 260 m (853 ft)Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Max candela: 16900 cdOlight Seeker 4 Pro — Weight: 223 g (7.87 oz)Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Length: 133 mm (5.24 in)Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Retail price: US$139.99Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Impact resistance: 1.5 m (5 ft)Beam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceImpact resistance
Price & carry
Retail price
US$114.9Cheapest
US$139.99Most expensive
Weight
250 g (8.82 oz)Heaviest
223 g (7.87 oz)Lightest
Length
152 mm (5.98 in)Longest
133 mm (5.24 in)Shortest
Output
Max lumens
5000 lmHighest output
4600 lmLowest output
Max candela
105625 cdHighest candela
16900 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
650 m (2133 ft)Highest
260 m (853 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
17280 minLongest runtime
60 minShortest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
21700 rechargeable Li-ion
21700 rechargeable lithium-ion (proprietary)
Charging type
USB-C built-in port
USB-C, magnetic (optional MCC3 charger)
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IPX8
Impact resistance
1 m (3 ft)Lowest
1.5 m (5 ft)Highest
Material
AL6061-T6 aluminum alloy, stainless steel strike bezel
Anodized aluminum alloy with rubberized grip
Use case profile
Best for
▣Tactical Use▣Outdoor Activities▣Professional Lighting Needs▣EDC With Long Runtime And High Output
▣EDC Use▣Camping▣Hiking▣Maintenance▣Night Duty▣Dog Walking▣Emergency▣Flood Illumination▣Terrain Lighting
Common praise
✓Excellent Beam Pattern Combining Flood And Long Throw✓Very Bright With A Practical Beam For Close And Far Use✓Solid And Premium Build Quality✓Versatile Dual Switch Interface✓Long Runtime Especially In Moonlight Mode✓Convenient Built In USB C Rechargeable Battery
✓Bright Output With A Wide And Smooth Flood Beam✓Convenient Dual Charging Options Including USB C✓Intuitive Rotary Switch With Stepless Dimming✓Durable Ipx8 Waterproof Rating✓Built In Charging Holster With Multiple Carrying Options
Common complaints
⚠Tail Switch Design Changed From Previous Version May Affect Tailstanding Capability⚠Some Users Report A Heavier Weight With Included Battery⚠Price Is Moderately High But Justified By Performance
⚠Auto Lock Feature Can Be Frustrating Without Holster⚠Weight May Be Heavy For Some Users For Pocket Carry

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online