← Back

Comparison Console

Acebeam L35 2.0 vs Wurkkos TD01C SFT40

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam L35 2.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam L35 2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 178% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Acebeam L35 2.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Acebeam L35 2.0 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 64% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Acebeam L35 2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 178% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 99% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Acebeam L35 2.0 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 14300% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Acebeam L35 2.0 — Beam distance: 650 m (2133 ft)Acebeam L35 2.0 — Max candela: 105625 cdAcebeam L35 2.0 — Weight: 250 g (8.82 oz)Acebeam L35 2.0 — Retail price: US$114.9Acebeam L35 2.0 — Max lumens: 5000 lmAcebeam L35 2.0 — Max runtime: 17280 minWurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Beam distance: 1000 m (3281 ft)Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Max candela: 270000 cdWurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Weight: 196 g (6.91 oz)Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Retail price: US$135Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Max lumens: 1800 lmWurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Max runtime: 120 minBeam distanceMax candelaWeightRetail priceMax lumensMax runtime
Price & carry
Retail price
US$114.9Cheapest
US$135Most expensive
Weight
250 g (8.82 oz)Heaviest
196 g (6.91 oz)Lightest
Length
152 mm (5.98 in)
152 mm (5.98 in)
Output
Max lumens
5000 lmHighest output
1800 lmLowest output
Max candela
105625 cdLowest candela
270000 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
650 m (2133 ft)Lowest
1000 m (3281 ft)Highest
Max runtime
17280 minLongest runtime
120 minShortest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
21700 rechargeable Li-ion
1x 21700 lithium-ion rechargeable battery
Charging type
USB-C built-in port
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IPX8
Impact resistance
1 m (3 ft)
Unknown
Material
AL6061-T6 aluminum alloy, stainless steel strike bezel
6061 aviation aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
Tactical useOutdoor activitiesProfessional lighting needsEDC with long runtime and high output
Outdoor adventuresLong-distance throwTactical useHuntingGeneral purpose torch
Common praise
Excellent beam pattern combining flood and long throwVery bright with a practical beam for close and far useSolid and premium build qualityVersatile dual switch interfaceLong runtime especially in moonlight modeConvenient built-in USB-C rechargeable battery
Strong regulated output with stable brightnessVery long throw distance (~1000m)Good build quality for priceUSB-C onboard charging convenienceMultiple user interface modes including tactical
Common complaints
Tail switch design changed from previous version may affect tailstanding capabilitySome users report a heavier weight with included batteryPrice is moderately high but justified by performance
Output lower than some competitor modelsLightweight build perceived as light-dutyComplex UI with many shortcuts can be confusingNot best for sustained high turbo output compared to premium throwers

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online