← Back

Comparison Console

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 vs Sofirn SC31T

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative. Sofirn SC31T stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 100% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 152% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Lightest

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Sofirn SC31T stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 50% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Sofirn SC31T stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 100% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Sofirn SC31T stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 60% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 152% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 stands out as the shortest option for length, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Sofirn SC31T stands out as the longest option for length, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 — Beam distance: 105 m (344 ft)Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 — Max candela: 2756 cdAcebeam Rider RX 2.0 — Weight: 65.8 g (2.32 oz)Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 — Length: 96 mm (3.78 in)Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 — Max lumens: 1000 lmAcebeam Rider RX 2.0 — Max runtime: 3480 minSofirn SC31T — Beam distance: 243.6 m (799 ft)Sofirn SC31T — Max candela: 14832 cdSofirn SC31T — Weight: 67 g (2.36 oz)Sofirn SC31T — Length: 125.5 mm (4.94 in)Sofirn SC31T — Max lumens: 2000 lmSofirn SC31T — Max runtime: 1380 minBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthMax lumensMax runtime
Price & carry
Retail price
Unknown
US$31
Weight
65.8 g (2.32 oz)Lightest
67 g (2.36 oz)Heaviest
Length
96 mm (3.78 in)Shortest
125.5 mm (4.94 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
1000 lmLowest output
2000 lmHighest output
Max candela
2756 cdLowest candela
14832 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
105 m (344 ft)Lowest
243.6 m (799 ft)Highest
Max runtime
3480 minLongest runtime
1380 minShortest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1x 14500 rechargeable lithium-ion or 1x AA alkaline/Ni-MH
1x 18650 lithium-ion
Charging type
USB-C (battery)
USB-C (built-in)
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IPX8
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)
Unknown
Material
AL6061-T6 aluminium alloy with HAIII hard-anodised finish
Aluminum
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday Carry (EDC)Outdoor activitiesEmergency situations
Tactical useEDCHigh output illuminationRechargeable convenience
Common praise
Compact and lightweightDurable construction with IP68 ratingGood maximum output and beam distanceMultiple brightness levels with memory functionUSB-C rechargeable battery included and AA compatibleFidget clip feature appreciated by users with ADHD/autism
High maximum output of 2000 lumensDual switch interface for tactical useIntegrated USB-C charging with included cableGood build quality with anodized aluminum bodyIncludes comprehensive accessory kit (battery, clip, lanyard, spare o-rings)Affordable price point around 30 USDMemorable simple and functional user interface
Common complaints
Forward-clicky switch not preferred by all usersNo built-in charging on the flashlight body, charging in battery onlyPWM usage on all modes (though not very noticeable)
PWM present on most modes though fairly fast and mostly unnoticeableOscillating temperature regulation on turbo modeClip is a friction-fit, unidirectional, and not deep-carryTailstanding is unstable due to cutouts and switch cap designOutput may not fully meet manufacturer spec at sustained turboSome users prefer Anduril UI available on Pro variant

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online