← Back

Comparison Console

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 vs ThruNite Archer Pro V2

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

ThruNite Archer Pro V2 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative. ThruNite Archer Pro V2 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 521% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Lightest

ThruNite Archer Pro V2 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

ThruNite Archer Pro V2 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 84% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

ThruNite Archer Pro V2 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 521% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 stands out as the shortest option for length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

ThruNite Archer Pro V2 stands out as the longest option for length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 — Beam distance: 105 m (344 ft)Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 — Max candela: 2756 cdAcebeam Rider RX 2.0 — Weight: 65.8 g (2.32 oz)Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 — Length: 96 mm (3.78 in)Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 — Max lumens: 1000 lmAcebeam Rider RX 2.0 — Max runtime: 3480 minThruNite Archer Pro V2 — Beam distance: 187 m (614 ft)ThruNite Archer Pro V2 — Max candela: 48730 cdThruNite Archer Pro V2 — Weight: 65 g (2.29 oz)ThruNite Archer Pro V2 — Length: 98 mm (3.86 in)ThruNite Archer Pro V2 — Max lumens: 950 lmThruNite Archer Pro V2 — Max runtime: 21600 minBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthMax lumensMax runtime
Price & carry
Retail price
Unknown
US$24.95
Weight
65.8 g (2.32 oz)Heaviest
65 g (2.29 oz)Lightest
Length
96 mm (3.78 in)Shortest
98 mm (3.86 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
1000 lmHighest output
950 lmLowest output
Max candela
2756 cdLowest candela
48730 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
105 m (344 ft)Lowest
187 m (614 ft)Highest
Max runtime
3480 minShortest runtime
21600 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1x 14500 rechargeable lithium-ion or 1x AA alkaline/Ni-MH
Built-in 14500 1000mAh rechargeable battery
Charging type
USB-C (battery)
USB-C on-board charging
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IPX8 (2 meters)
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)
1.5 m (5 ft)
Material
AL6061-T6 aluminium alloy with HAIII hard-anodised finish
Unknown
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry (EDC)▣Outdoor Activities▣Emergency Situations
▣EDC▣Pocket Carry▣Ramping Output Users
Common praise
✓Compact And Lightweight✓Durable Construction With Ip68 Rating✓Good Maximum Output And Beam Distance✓Multiple Brightness Levels With Memory Function✓USB C Rechargeable Battery Included And Aa Compatible✓Fidget Clip Feature Appreciated By Users With Adhd/autism
✓Compact And Pocketable Design✓USB C On Board Charging Works Well✓Ramping Brightness Control Is Smooth And Logical✓Good Mode Spacing From Firefly To Turbo✓Two Way Pocket Clip For Versatile Carry
Common complaints
⚠Forward Clicky Switch Not Preferred By All Users⚠No Built In Charging On The Flashlight Body, Charging In Battery Only⚠Pwm Usage On All Modes (though Not Very Noticeable)
⚠Battery Is Built In And Not Easily Swappable⚠Ramping Direction Memory Is Counterintuitive⚠Limited Disassembly Options⚠Low Cri Around 70

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online