← Back

Comparison Console

Acebeam Rider RX vs Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Acebeam Rider RX stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 592% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Acebeam Rider RX stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Acebeam Rider RX stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Acebeam Rider RX stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 86% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 592% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Acebeam Rider RX stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 40% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 67% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Acebeam Rider RX — Beam distance: 96 m (315 ft)Acebeam Rider RX — Max candela: 2304 cdAcebeam Rider RX — Weight: 82 g (2.89 oz)Acebeam Rider RX — Length: 95.7 mm (3.77 in)Acebeam Rider RX — Retail price: US$50Acebeam Rider RX — Impact resistance: 1 m (3 ft)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Beam distance: 191 m (627 ft)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Max candela: 9150 cdWurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Weight: 95 g (3.35 oz)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Length: 122 mm (4.80 in)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Retail price: US$40Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Impact resistance: 2 m (7 ft)Beam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceImpact resistance
Price & carry
Retail price
US$50Most expensive
US$40Cheapest
Weight
82 g (2.89 oz)Lightest
95 g (3.35 oz)Heaviest
Length
95.7 mm (3.77 in)Shortest
122 mm (4.80 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
650 lmLowest output
4500 lmHighest output
Max candela
2304 cdLowest candela
9150 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
96 m (315 ft)Lowest
191 m (627 ft)Highest
Max runtime
10080 minShortest runtime
16800 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
14500 Li-ion or AA battery (Alkaline/NiMH)
21700
Charging type
USB-C via included rechargeable 14500 battery
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IP68
Impact resistance
1 m (3 ft)Lowest
2 m (7 ft)Highest
Material
Aluminum alloy body with stainless steel outer shell
Aviation-grade 6061 aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry▣EDC▣Gift▣Stress Relief Via Fidget Feature▣Outdoor Use▣Home Use
▣Everyday Carry (EDC)▣General Outdoor Use▣Camping▣Emergency Use
Common praise
✓High Color Rendering Index (cri 90) LED With Pleasant Neutral 5000k Tint✓Good Maximum Brightness For Size✓Durable Stainless Steel Outer Shell And Aluminum Body✓Fidget Clip Feature Praised As A Stress Relief Gadget✓Included USB C Rechargeable Battery✓Smooth And Comfortable Design✓Good User Interface With Memory Function
✓High Output With Stable Brightness✓Good Grip With Unique Ridged Body Design✓Includes Battery And USB C Charging Cable✓Magnetic Tailcap For Mounting✓Good Waterproof Rating And Durability
Common complaints
⚠Requires Break In Period For Smooth Clip Sliding⚠Switch Type Preference Varies (forward Clicky Used)⚠Surface Can Get Hot On Continuous Use⚠No Reverse Clicky Switch And No Onboard Charging (battery Charges Via USB C Port On Battery)
⚠Ui Can Be Less Intuitive With Minor Quirks⚠Aggressive Knurling Pattern Can Be Uncomfortable⚠Packaging And Documentation Confusing About LED Model⚠Switch Has Some Play And May Require Deliberate Presses

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online