← Back

Comparison Console

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 vs Wuben T4

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Wuben T4 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 50% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Wuben T4 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 39% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Wuben T4 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Wuben T4 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 21% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 — Beam distance: 360 m (1181 ft)Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 — Max candela: 32400 cdAcebeam TAC AA 2.0 — Weight: 75.4 g (2.66 oz)Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 — Length: 104.6 mm (4.12 in)Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 — Retail price: US$40Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 — Max lumens: 1000 lmWuben T4 — Beam distance: 401 m (1316 ft)Wuben T4 — Max candela: 40200 cdWuben T4 — Weight: 104.7 g (3.69 oz)Wuben T4 — Length: 97 mm (3.82 in)Wuben T4 — Retail price: US$60Wuben T4 — Max lumens: 850 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$40Cheapest
US$60Most expensive
Weight
75.4 g (2.66 oz)Lightest
104.7 g (3.69 oz)Heaviest
Length
104.6 mm (4.12 in)Longest
97 mm (3.82 in)Shortest
Output
Max lumens
1000 lmHighest output
850 lmLowest output
Max candela
32400 cdLowest candela
40200 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
360 m (1181 ft)Lowest
401 m (1316 ft)Highest
Max runtime
3480 minShortest runtime
4200 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1 x 14500 USB-C rechargeable battery or 1 AA battery (Alkaline/NiMH)
18350 Lithium-Ion (rechargeable)
Charging type
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IP68
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)
1.5 m (5 ft)
Material
Anodized aircraft aluminum alloy
7075 aluminum alloy (original color), 6061 aluminum alloy (black color)
Use case profile
Best for
EDC useTactical lightingCampingHikingEmergency situations
Everyday carry (EDC)Tactical usePersonal and home defenseSecurity personnel use
Common praise
High output for sizeGood beam distanceDurable construction with IP68 ratingDual fuel flexibilityTail standing and pocket clipMultiple usable modes including strobe and SOS
Compact and lightweight designHigh beam distance for sizeVersatile mode selector with tactical and duty modesMechanical tail switch with mode dialUSB-C rechargeable batteryAffordable price point
Common complaints
Body clip non-removable and somewhat tightLarger head diameter compared to other AA lightsRubber boot improved but tailcap and bezel non-removable
Limited number of brightness levelsMedium PWM flicker on all modesMemory function reactivates next brightness level, not last used levelLower candela and beam throw compared to some competitors