Comparison Console
Acebeam Terminator M1 vs Streamlight Stinger 2020
EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Acebeam Terminator M1 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative. Streamlight Stinger 2020 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative. Acebeam Terminator M1 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 75% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Streamlight Stinger 2020 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.
Acebeam Terminator M1 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.
Acebeam Terminator M1 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.
Streamlight Stinger 2020 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.
Streamlight Stinger 2020 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 43% gap from the closest alternative.
Acebeam Terminator M1 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 75% gap from the closest alternative.
Acebeam Terminator M1 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 89% gap from the closest alternative.
Streamlight Stinger 2020 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 789% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$279.9Most expensive
US$225Cheapest
Weight
305 g (10.76 oz)Lightest
349 g (12.31 oz)Heaviest
Length
104 mm (4.09 in)Shortest
195 mm (7.68 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
3500 lmHighest output
2000 lmLowest output
Max candela
640000 cdHighest candela
25000 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
1600 m (5249 ft)Highest
315 m (1033 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
162 minShortest runtime
1440 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
21700 Li-ion
2 x SL-B26 Lithium-Ion Rechargeable (2600mAh)
Charging type
USB-C on-cell
Micro USB charging cradle and built-in Micro USB port on batteries
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IPX7
Impact resistance
1 m (3 ft)Lowest
2 m (7 ft)Highest
Material
AL6061-T6 aluminum alloy
CNC machined aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
Long-range searchingEDC with both flood and throwSearch and rescueIndustrial applicationsHikingCave exploration
Tactical useDuty useOutdoor activitiesEvery situation requiring powerful illumination
Common praise
Unique and versatile combination of zoomable LEP and LED lightsExcellent beam quality with high CRI LEDs and precise LEP spotlightCompact size for a dual-head 21700 flashlightGood build quality and durable materialsLong runtime and effective battery charging via USB-C
High maximum output and brightnessLong runtime especially on medium and low modesErgonomic design with firm grip and anti-roll bodyMode selector switch allowing quick access to desired outputMultiple activation switches (front and tail) for convenienceIPX7 water resistance and 2 meter impact resistanceCompatibility with existing Stinger chargersBuilt-in Micro USB charging on batteries for on-the-go charging
Common complaints
Cannot run LEP and LED simultaneouslyHeavier and larger than typical pocket EDC flashlightsNo indicator for which light source is active when offTailcap removal required for charging may lead to user inconvenienceLanyard could be longer for neck carryZoom operation may require two hands for some users
Maximum output is a brief burst then steps down to half-brightnessSwitches require considerable force to activate constant on, less comfortable than older modelsWide beam angle reduces peak beam intensity and range compared to previous high-intensity variants