← Back

Comparison Console

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 vs Fenix HM65R-T V2.0

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative. Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative. Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 32% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 50% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 100% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 — Max candela: 7353 cdFenix HM65R-T v2.0 — Weight: 120 g (4.23 oz)Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 — Retail price: US$105Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 — Max lumens: 1600 lmFenix HM65R-T v2.0 — Max runtime: 36000 minFenix HM65R-T v2.0 — Beam distance: 170 m (558 ft)Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 — Max candela: 7261 cdFenix HM65R-T V2.0 — Weight: 91 g (3.21 oz)Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 — Retail price: US$109.95Fenix HM65R-T V2.0 — Max lumens: 1700 lmFenix HM65R-T V2.0 — Max runtime: 18000 minFenix HM65R-T V2.0 — Beam distance: 170 m (558 ft)Max candelaWeightRetail priceMax lumensMax runtimeBeam distance
Price & carry
Retail price
US$105Cheapest
US$109.95Most expensive
Weight
120 g (4.23 oz)Heaviest
91 g (3.21 oz)Lightest
Length
Unknown
80 mm (3.15 in)
Output
Max lumens
1600 lmLowest output
1700 lmHighest output
Max candela
7353 cdHighest candela
7261 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
170 m (558 ft)
170 m (558 ft)
Max runtime
36000 minLongest runtime
18000 minShortest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
18650 rechargeable battery
Integrated 3400mAh rechargeable battery
Charging type
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IP68
Impact resistance
2 m (7 ft)
2 m (7 ft)
Material
Magnesium alloy, aluminum, polycarbonate
Magnesium alloy
Use case profile
Best for
▣Trail Running▣Working Around The House/garage/yard▣Hiking▣Hunting/fishing▣Technical Trail Running▣Fast Moving Night Efforts
▣Trail Running▣Caving▣Professional Use
Common praise
✓High Maximum Output Of 1600 Lumens✓Dual Beam System With Cool And Warm White Leds For Versatile Use✓Comfortable And Adjustable Sport Fit Headband With Single Hand Adjustment✓Durable Magnesium Alloy Frame Reducing Weight And Increasing Strength✓Long Battery Runtime And USB C Rechargeable Battery✓High Ip68 Waterproof Rating And 2 Meter Impact Resistance✓Adjustable Beam Angle From Straight Ahead To Nearly 90 Degrees Downward
✓Lightweight And Comfortable For Head Use✓High Brightness With Versatile Beam Options✓Good Battery Capacity And USB C Rechargeability✓Durable Magnesium Alloy Body With Strong Water And Impact Resistance
Common complaints
⚠Not Ideal For Jogging Due To Strap Design Lacking Third Top Strap⚠Battery Is Built In And Not Hot Swappable For Multi Day Use⚠Potential Surface Oxidation If Anodization Damaged⚠USB C Port Cover Is A Common Failure Point Impacting Waterproofness
⚠No Explicit Common Complaints Found In Sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online