← Back

Comparison Console

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 vs Sofirn D25S

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative. Sofirn D25S stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 82% gap from the closest alternative. Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Sofirn D25S stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 82% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 453% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Sofirn D25S stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Sofirn D25S stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest candela

Sofirn D25S stands out as the lowest candela option for max candela, with about a 90% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest candela

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 stands out as the highest candela option for max candela, with about a 950% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 — Beam distance: 170 m (558 ft)Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 — Max candela: 7353 cdFenix HM65R-T v2.0 — Weight: 120 g (4.23 oz)Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 — Retail price: US$105Fenix HM65R-T v2.0 — Max lumens: 1600 lmSofirn D25S — Beam distance: 53 m (174 ft)Sofirn D25S — Max candela: 700 cdSofirn D25S — Weight: 122 g (4.30 oz)Sofirn D25S — Retail price: US$19Sofirn D25S — Max lumens: 1200 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$105Most expensive
US$19Cheapest
Weight
120 g (4.23 oz)Lightest
122 g (4.30 oz)Heaviest
Length
Unknown
85.8 mm (3.38 in)
Output
Max lumens
1600 lmHighest output
1200 lmLowest output
Max candela
7353 cdHighest candela
700 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
170 m (558 ft)Highest
53 m (174 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
36000 min
Unknown
Power & durability
Battery type
18650 rechargeable battery
18650
Charging type
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IPX6
Impact resistance
2 m (7 ft)
Unknown
Material
Magnesium alloy, aluminum, polycarbonate
Aluminum Alloy
Use case profile
Best for
▣Trail Running▣Working Around The House/garage/yard▣Hiking▣Hunting/fishing▣Technical Trail Running▣Fast Moving Night Efforts
▣Camping▣Running▣Hiking▣General Outdoor Activities▣Headlamp Use▣Light Painting When Removed From Headband
Common praise
✓High Maximum Output Of 1600 Lumens✓Dual Beam System With Cool And Warm White Leds For Versatile Use✓Comfortable And Adjustable Sport Fit Headband With Single Hand Adjustment✓Durable Magnesium Alloy Frame Reducing Weight And Increasing Strength✓Long Battery Runtime And USB C Rechargeable Battery✓High Ip68 Waterproof Rating And 2 Meter Impact Resistance✓Adjustable Beam Angle From Straight Ahead To Nearly 90 Degrees Downward
✓Affordable Price For Features✓Good Beam Quality With Artifact Free Hotspot✓Simple And Effective User Interface✓Comfortable Headband Without Top Strap✓Rechargeable With USB C Port✓Functional Red And White Leds✓Effective Thermal Regulation And Low Voltage Protection
Common complaints
⚠Not Ideal For Jogging Due To Strap Design Lacking Third Top Strap⚠Battery Is Built In And Not Hot Swappable For Multi Day Use⚠Potential Surface Oxidation If Anodization Damaged⚠USB C Port Cover Is A Common Failure Point Impacting Waterproofness
⚠Build Quality Is Described As Sub Par With Shallow Unlubricated Threads⚠Switch Placement On Side Instead Of Top May Reduce Ergonomics⚠Slightly Heavy For Running⚠No Pocket Clip, Magnet, Or Lanyard Included For Handheld Use

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online