← Back

Comparison Console

Nitecore MT2C Pro vs Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 150% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Nitecore MT2C Pro stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Nitecore MT2C Pro stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Nitecore MT2C Pro stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 60% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 150% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Nitecore MT2C Pro stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 90% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 900% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Nitecore MT2C Pro — Beam distance: 520 m (1706 ft)Nitecore MT2C Pro — Max candela: 80000 cdNitecore MT2C Pro — Weight: 114 g (4.02 oz)Nitecore MT2C Pro — Length: 117.5 mm (4.63 in)Nitecore MT2C Pro — Retail price: US$54Nitecore MT2C Pro — Max lumens: 1800 lmWurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Beam distance: 191 m (627 ft)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Max candela: 9150 cdWurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Weight: 95 g (3.35 oz)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Length: 122 mm (4.80 in)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Retail price: US$40Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Max lumens: 4500 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$54Most expensive
US$40Cheapest
Weight
114 g (4.02 oz)Heaviest
95 g (3.35 oz)Lightest
Length
117.5 mm (4.63 in)Shortest
122 mm (4.80 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
1800 lmLowest output
4500 lmHighest output
Max candela
80000 cdHighest candela
9150 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
520 m (1706 ft)Highest
191 m (627 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
1680 minShortest runtime
16800 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
18650 Li-ion rechargeable, or 2 x CR123A/RCR123
21700
Charging type
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IP68
Impact resistance
2 m (7 ft)
2 m (7 ft)
Material
Aerospace-grade aluminum with HA III anodizing finish
Aviation-grade 6061 aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday Carry (EDC)Tactical and High-Performance UseOutdoor Adventures
Everyday carry (EDC)General outdoor useCampingEmergency use
Common praise
Compact and lightweight designHigh max output brightness (1800 lumens) with strong throw (520 m)Durability including IP68 waterproof rating and 2 meter impact resistanceSimple and easy tail switch interfaceIncludes rechargeable battery and USB-C charging cableGood thermal regulation and LVP
High output with stable brightnessGood grip with unique ridged body designIncludes battery and USB-C charging cableMagnetic tailcap for mountingGood waterproof rating and durability
Common complaints
Only two brightness modes which limits versatilityTurns on in high mode by default, not lowColor rendering and tint not optimized (beam focused on throw)
UI can be less intuitive with minor quirksAggressive knurling pattern can be uncomfortablePackaging and documentation confusing about LED modelSwitch has some play and may require deliberate presses

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online