← Back

Comparison Console

Nitecore MT2C Pro vs Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 150% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Nitecore MT2C Pro stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Nitecore MT2C Pro stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Nitecore MT2C Pro stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 60% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 150% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Nitecore MT2C Pro stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 90% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 900% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Nitecore MT2C Pro — Beam distance: 520 m (1706 ft)Nitecore MT2C Pro — Max candela: 80000 cdNitecore MT2C Pro — Weight: 114 g (4.02 oz)Nitecore MT2C Pro — Length: 117.5 mm (4.63 in)Nitecore MT2C Pro — Retail price: US$54Nitecore MT2C Pro — Max lumens: 1800 lmWurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Beam distance: 191 m (627 ft)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Max candela: 9150 cdWurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Weight: 95 g (3.35 oz)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Length: 122 mm (4.80 in)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Retail price: US$40Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Max lumens: 4500 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$54Most expensive
US$40Cheapest
Weight
114 g (4.02 oz)Heaviest
95 g (3.35 oz)Lightest
Length
117.5 mm (4.63 in)Shortest
122 mm (4.80 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
1800 lmLowest output
4500 lmHighest output
Max candela
80000 cdHighest candela
9150 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
520 m (1706 ft)Highest
191 m (627 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
1680 minShortest runtime
16800 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
18650 Li-ion rechargeable, or 2 x CR123A/RCR123
21700
Charging type
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IP68
Impact resistance
2 m (7 ft)
2 m (7 ft)
Material
Aerospace-grade aluminum with HA III anodizing finish
Aviation-grade 6061 aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry (EDC)▣Tactical And High Performance Use▣Outdoor Adventures
▣Everyday Carry (EDC)▣General Outdoor Use▣Camping▣Emergency Use
Common praise
✓Compact And Lightweight Design✓High Max Output Brightness (1800 Lumens) With Strong Throw (520 M)✓Durability Including Ip68 Waterproof Rating And 2 Meter Impact Resistance✓Simple And Easy Tail Switch Interface✓Includes Rechargeable Battery And USB C Charging Cable✓Good Thermal Regulation And Lvp
✓High Output With Stable Brightness✓Good Grip With Unique Ridged Body Design✓Includes Battery And USB C Charging Cable✓Magnetic Tailcap For Mounting✓Good Waterproof Rating And Durability
Common complaints
⚠Only Two Brightness Modes Which Limits Versatility⚠Turns On In High Mode By Default, Not Low⚠Color Rendering And Tint Not Optimized (beam Focused On Throw)
⚠Ui Can Be Less Intuitive With Minor Quirks⚠Aggressive Knurling Pattern Can Be Uncomfortable⚠Packaging And Documentation Confusing About LED Model⚠Switch Has Some Play And May Require Deliberate Presses

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online