← Back

Comparison Console

Nitecore NU25 UL vs Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Nitecore NU25 UL stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 37% gap from the closest alternative. Nitecore NU25 UL stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 34% gap from the closest alternative. Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 425% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Nitecore NU25 UL stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 34% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 51% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Nitecore NU25 UL stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 37% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 58% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Nitecore NU25 UL stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 81% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 425% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Nitecore NU25 UL stands out as the shortest option for length, with about a 46% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the longest option for length, with about a 86% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Nitecore NU25 UL — Beam distance: 64 m (210 ft)Nitecore NU25 UL — Max candela: 1029 cdNitecore NU25 UL — Weight: 45 g (1.59 oz)Nitecore NU25 UL — Length: 60.1 mm (2.37 in)Nitecore NU25 UL — Retail price: US$37Nitecore NU25 UL — Max lumens: 400 lmSofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Beam distance: 215 m (705 ft)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Max candela: 11525 cdSofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Weight: 71 g (2.50 oz)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Length: 112 mm (4.41 in)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Retail price: US$56Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Max lumens: 2100 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$37Cheapest
US$56Most expensive
Weight
45 g (1.59 oz)Lightest
71 g (2.50 oz)Heaviest
Length
60.1 mm (2.37 in)Shortest
112 mm (4.41 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
400 lmLowest output
2100 lmHighest output
Max candela
1029 cdLowest candela
11525 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
64 m (210 ft)Lowest
215 m (705 ft)Highest
Max runtime
2700 min
Unknown
Power & durability
Battery type
Built-in 650mAh Li-ion
1x 18650 3.7v unprotected lithium battery (included)
Charging type
USB-C (~1.5 hours)
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP66
IP66
Impact resistance
1 m (3 ft)
1 m (3 ft)
Material
ABS plastic
Aluminum
Use case profile
Best for
▣Ultralight Hiking▣Backpacking▣Trail Running▣Alpine Climbing▣Nighttime Outdoor Activities
▣Hunting▣General Outdoor Use▣EDC▣Camping▣Hiking▣Fishing
Common praise
✓Exceptional Lightweight At 45g With Good Output✓Versatile Dual Beam (spot And Flood) Options✓Accurate And Long Runtimes Especially Ultralow Mode✓Fast USB C Charging (~1.5 Hours)✓Comfortable And Secure Lightweight Strap✓Ip66 Weatherproofing For Rugged Outdoor Use✓Clear Battery Level Indicators
✓High Sustained Brightness✓Good Balance Of Price And Features✓Versatile Beam Types (spot, Flood, Red)✓Lightweight And Compact For A Triple Channel Headlamp✓USB C Charging Convenient✓Regulated Output For Stable Brightness
Common complaints
⚠Red Light Mode Is Too Bright And Lacks Dimming Options⚠Non Replaceable Built In Battery Limits Long Term Maintenance⚠User Interface Is Complex And Requires Reading The Manual⚠Shock Cord Strap May Not Suit Users Preferring Traditional Padded Bands⚠Battery Capacity Modest For Extended Multi Week Trips
⚠No Glass Lens Protection (optic Exposed)⚠Magnet Weak On Thin Metal⚠Lacks Lanyard Attachment Included⚠Tailcap Design Hinders Flat Tailstanding With Lanyard Attached

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online