← Back

Comparison Console

Olight Baton 3 Pro vs Olight Warrior Mini 3

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Olight Baton 3 Pro stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative. Olight Baton 3 Pro stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative. Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Olight Baton 3 Pro stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Olight Baton 3 Pro stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Olight Baton 3 Pro stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Olight Warrior Mini 3 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 84% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Olight Baton 3 Pro stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 540% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Olight Baton 3 Pro — Beam distance: 175 m (574 ft)Olight Baton 3 Pro — Max candela: 7900 cdOlight Baton 3 Pro — Weight: 103 g (3.63 oz)Olight Baton 3 Pro — Length: 101.4 mm (3.99 in)Olight Baton 3 Pro — Retail price: US$69.99Olight Baton 3 Pro — Max lumens: 1500 lmOlight Warrior Mini 3 — Beam distance: 240 m (787 ft)Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Max candela: 14400 cdOlight Warrior Mini 3 — Weight: 105 g (3.70 oz)Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Length: 106.5 mm (4.19 in)Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Retail price: US$87.95Olight Warrior Mini 3 — Max lumens: 1750 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$69.99Cheapest
US$87.95Most expensive
Weight
103 g (3.63 oz)Lightest
105 g (3.70 oz)Heaviest
Length
101.4 mm (3.99 in)Shortest
106.5 mm (4.19 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
1500 lmLowest output
1750 lmHighest output
Max candela
7900 cdLowest candela
14400 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
175 m (574 ft)Lowest
240 m (787 ft)Highest
Max runtime
172800 minLongest runtime
27000 minShortest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1 x Olight 18650 3200mAh lithium-ion battery
1*18650 rechargeable lithium-ion
Charging type
USB magnetic charging (MCC3)
Proprietary magnetic MCC3 charging cable
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX8 (waterproof up to 2 m)
IPX8
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)
1.5 m (5 ft)
Material
Unknown
Aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryOutdoor activitiesLong runtimeReliable brightness
EDCTactical useSelf-defenseOutdoors lighting
Common praise
Bright maximum output of 1500 lumensLong runtime up to 120 days on low modeConvenient magnetic USB chargingCompact and lightweight designGood waterproof rating and impact resistance
High output lumens for sizeSolid build qualityDual switches for tactical and daily useIPX8 waterproof ratingMagnetic charging convenience
Common complaints
Intensity step-down from 1500 to 600 lumens after 2 minutes may limit high output durationNo detailed material specification available
Minor size reduction from previous model may affect grip comfortNo increase in max output from previous generationTail switch complexity may require learning curve