← Back

Comparison Console

Olight R50 Seeker vs Wurkkos TD01C SFT40

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative. Olight R50 Seeker stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative. Olight R50 Seeker stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 39% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Olight R50 Seeker stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Olight R50 Seeker stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 30% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Olight R50 Seeker stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 39% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 96% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Olight R50 Seeker stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 2400% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Olight R50 Seeker — Beam distance: 297 m (974 ft)Olight R50 Seeker — Max candela: 22000 cdOlight R50 Seeker — Weight: 255 g (8.99 oz)Olight R50 Seeker — Length: 133 mm (5.24 in)Olight R50 Seeker — Retail price: US$129.22Olight R50 Seeker — Max lumens: 2500 lmWurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Beam distance: 1000 m (3281 ft)Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Max candela: 270000 cdWurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Weight: 196 g (6.91 oz)Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Length: 152 mm (5.98 in)Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Retail price: US$135Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Max lumens: 1800 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$129.22Cheapest
US$135Most expensive
Weight
255 g (8.99 oz)Heaviest
196 g (6.91 oz)Lightest
Length
133 mm (5.24 in)Shortest
152 mm (5.98 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
2500 lmHighest output
1800 lmLowest output
Max candela
22000 cdLowest candela
270000 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
297 m (974 ft)Lowest
1000 m (3281 ft)Highest
Max runtime
3000 minLongest runtime
120 minShortest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
Custom 26650 rechargeable lithium-ion
1x 21700 lithium-ion rechargeable battery
Charging type
Micro-USB
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX8 (up to 2 meters)
IPX8
Impact resistance
1 m (3 ft)
Unknown
Material
Aircraft-grade aluminum with type III hard anodizing
6061 aviation aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
▣General Purpose Handheld Use▣Security▣Police▣Industrial▣Home Lighting
▣Outdoor Adventures▣Long Distance Throw▣Tactical Use▣Hunting▣General Purpose Torch
Common praise
✓High Maximum Output And Long Runtime✓Robust Build Quality And Design✓Versatile And Intuitive User Interface With Multiple Modes And Lockout✓Excellent Beam Quality With Wide Spill And Bright Hotspot✓Convenient Built In Rechargeable Battery And USB Charging
✓Strong Regulated Output With Stable Brightness✓Very Long Throw Distance (~1000m)✓Good Build Quality For Price✓USB C Onboard Charging Convenience✓Multiple User Interface Modes Including Tactical
Common complaints
⚠No Pocket Clip Included⚠No Holster Or Pouch Provided⚠Proprietary Battery Limits External Charging Options⚠Light Is Too Large For Comfortable Pocket Carry⚠Lens Protection Accessory Not Included
⚠Output Lower Than Some Competitor Models⚠Lightweight Build Perceived As Light Duty⚠Complex Ui With Many Shortcuts Can Be Confusing⚠Not Best For Sustained High Turbo Output Compared To Premium Throwers

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online