← Back

Comparison Console

Olight S1 Mini Baton vs ThruNite Archer 1A V3

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

ThruNite Archer 1A V3 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative. ThruNite Archer 1A V3 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative. Olight S1 Mini Baton stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 200% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

ThruNite Archer 1A V3 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Olight S1 Mini Baton stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 39% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

ThruNite Archer 1A V3 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Olight S1 Mini Baton stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

ThruNite Archer 1A V3 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 67% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Olight S1 Mini Baton stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 200% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Olight S1 Mini Baton stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 83% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

ThruNite Archer 1A V3 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 475% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Olight S1 Mini Baton — Beam distance: 100 m (328 ft)Olight S1 Mini Baton — Max candela: 2500 cdOlight S1 Mini Baton — Weight: 43 g (1.52 oz)Olight S1 Mini Baton — Length: 54 mm (2.13 in)Olight S1 Mini Baton — Retail price: US$50Olight S1 Mini Baton — Max lumens: 600 lmThruNite Archer 1A V3 — Beam distance: 66 m (217 ft)ThruNite Archer 1A V3 — Max candela: 1088 cdThruNite Archer 1A V3 — Weight: 42 g (1.48 oz)ThruNite Archer 1A V3 — Length: 110 mm (4.33 in)ThruNite Archer 1A V3 — Retail price: US$35.95ThruNite Archer 1A V3 — Max lumens: 200 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$50Most expensive
US$35.95Cheapest
Weight
43 g (1.52 oz)Heaviest
42 g (1.48 oz)Lightest
Length
54 mm (2.13 in)Shortest
110 mm (4.33 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
600 lmHighest output
200 lmLowest output
Max candela
2500 cdHighest candela
1088 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
100 m (328 ft)Highest
66 m (217 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
1800 minShortest runtime
10350 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1 x 16340/RCR123A or CR123A
1x AA battery or 14500 Li-ion rechargeable battery
Charging type
Micro-USB (via rechargeable battery)
Unknown
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX-8
IPX-8
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)
1.5 m (5 ft)
Material
Aluminum
Aircraft grade aluminum with Type III hard-anodized finish
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry (EDC)▣Urban And Office Use▣General Close Range Illumination▣Ultralight Backpacking
▣Everyday Carry▣Emergency And Defense Situations▣Law Enforcement▣Emergency Medical Services▣Security▣Biking▣Camping▣Fishing
Common praise
✓Small Size With Strong Output For EDC✓Useful Rechargeable Battery Included With USB Charging✓Good Beam Pattern With Flood And Some Throw✓Durable Aluminum Construction With Ipx8 Waterproof Rating✓Versatile Clip Allowing Tip Up Or Tip Down Carry
✓Compact Size✓Versatile Brightness Modes✓Good Build Quality✓Ability To Use Aa Or 14500 Batteries✓Strike Bezel For Emergency Use✓IPX 8 Waterproof Rating✓Impact Resistant To 1.5 Meters✓Good Battery Runtime In Various Modes
Common complaints
⚠Tail Magnet Is Weak For Some Use Cases⚠Clip Attachment Can Be Stiff And Require Two Hands⚠Confusing Model Naming⚠Turbo Mode Not Available With Standard Cr123a Cells⚠Some Users Desire Stronger Grip Texture
⚠Pocket Clip Design Changed From V2 And Does Not Hold As Securely⚠Runtime May Be Less Than Manufacturer Specification On Highest Mode By About 25 30%

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online