← Back

Comparison Console

Olight Seeker 4 Pro vs Wurkkos TD01C SFT40

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative. Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 156% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 61% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 156% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 50% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 100% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Beam distance: 260 m (853 ft)Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Max candela: 16900 cdOlight Seeker 4 Pro — Weight: 223 g (7.87 oz)Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Length: 133 mm (5.24 in)Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Retail price: US$139.99Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Max lumens: 4600 lmWurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Beam distance: 1000 m (3281 ft)Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Max candela: 270000 cdWurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Weight: 196 g (6.91 oz)Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Length: 152 mm (5.98 in)Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Retail price: US$135Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Max lumens: 1800 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$139.99Most expensive
US$135Cheapest
Weight
223 g (7.87 oz)Heaviest
196 g (6.91 oz)Lightest
Length
133 mm (5.24 in)Shortest
152 mm (5.98 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
4600 lmHighest output
1800 lmLowest output
Max candela
16900 cdLowest candela
270000 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
260 m (853 ft)Lowest
1000 m (3281 ft)Highest
Max runtime
60 minShortest runtime
120 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
21700 rechargeable lithium-ion (proprietary)
1x 21700 lithium-ion rechargeable battery
Charging type
USB-C, magnetic (optional MCC3 charger)
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX8
IPX8
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)
Unknown
Material
Anodized aluminum alloy with rubberized grip
6061 aviation aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
▣EDC Use▣Camping▣Hiking▣Maintenance▣Night Duty▣Dog Walking▣Emergency▣Flood Illumination▣Terrain Lighting
▣Outdoor Adventures▣Long Distance Throw▣Tactical Use▣Hunting▣General Purpose Torch
Common praise
✓Bright Output With A Wide And Smooth Flood Beam✓Convenient Dual Charging Options Including USB C✓Intuitive Rotary Switch With Stepless Dimming✓Durable Ipx8 Waterproof Rating✓Built In Charging Holster With Multiple Carrying Options
✓Strong Regulated Output With Stable Brightness✓Very Long Throw Distance (~1000m)✓Good Build Quality For Price✓USB C Onboard Charging Convenience✓Multiple User Interface Modes Including Tactical
Common complaints
⚠Auto Lock Feature Can Be Frustrating Without Holster⚠Weight May Be Heavy For Some Users For Pocket Carry
⚠Output Lower Than Some Competitor Models⚠Lightweight Build Perceived As Light Duty⚠Complex Ui With Many Shortcuts Can Be Confusing⚠Not Best For Sustained High Turbo Output Compared To Premium Throwers

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online