← Back

Comparison Console

Olight Seeker 4 Pro vs Wurkkos TD01C SFT40

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative. Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 156% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 61% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 156% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Olight Seeker 4 Pro stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 50% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 100% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Beam distance: 260 m (853 ft)Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Max candela: 16900 cdOlight Seeker 4 Pro — Weight: 223 g (7.87 oz)Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Length: 133 mm (5.24 in)Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Retail price: US$139.99Olight Seeker 4 Pro — Max lumens: 4600 lmWurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Beam distance: 1000 m (3281 ft)Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Max candela: 270000 cdWurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Weight: 196 g (6.91 oz)Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Length: 152 mm (5.98 in)Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Retail price: US$135Wurkkos TD01C SFT40 — Max lumens: 1800 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$139.99Most expensive
US$135Cheapest
Weight
223 g (7.87 oz)Heaviest
196 g (6.91 oz)Lightest
Length
133 mm (5.24 in)Shortest
152 mm (5.98 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
4600 lmHighest output
1800 lmLowest output
Max candela
16900 cdLowest candela
270000 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
260 m (853 ft)Lowest
1000 m (3281 ft)Highest
Max runtime
60 minShortest runtime
120 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
21700 rechargeable lithium-ion (proprietary)
1x 21700 lithium-ion rechargeable battery
Charging type
USB-C, magnetic (optional MCC3 charger)
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX8
IPX8
Impact resistance
1.5 m (5 ft)
Unknown
Material
Anodized aluminum alloy with rubberized grip
6061 aviation aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
EDC useCampingHikingMaintenanceNight dutyDog walkingEmergencyFlood illuminationTerrain lighting
Outdoor adventuresLong-distance throwTactical useHuntingGeneral purpose torch
Common praise
Bright output with a wide and smooth flood beamConvenient dual charging options including USB-CIntuitive rotary switch with stepless dimmingDurable IPX8 waterproof ratingBuilt-in charging holster with multiple carrying options
Strong regulated output with stable brightnessVery long throw distance (~1000m)Good build quality for priceUSB-C onboard charging convenienceMultiple user interface modes including tactical
Common complaints
Auto-lock feature can be frustrating without holsterWeight may be heavy for some users for pocket carry
Output lower than some competitor modelsLightweight build perceived as light-dutyComplex UI with many shortcuts can be confusingNot best for sustained high turbo output compared to premium throwers

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online