← Back

Comparison Console

Olight Warrior Nano vs Wurkkos TD04

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Wurkkos TD04 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TD04 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TD04 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 150% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Wurkkos TD04 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Olight Warrior Nano stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Wurkkos TD04 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Olight Warrior Nano stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Olight Warrior Nano stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 60% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Wurkkos TD04 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 150% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Wurkkos TD04 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 78% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Olight Warrior Nano stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 344% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Olight Warrior Nano — Beam distance: 135 m (443 ft)Olight Warrior Nano — Max candela: 4700 cdOlight Warrior Nano — Weight: 85 g (3.00 oz)Olight Warrior Nano — Length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Olight Warrior Nano — Retail price: US$56.24Olight Warrior Nano — Max lumens: 1200 lmWurkkos TD04 — Beam distance: 295 m (968 ft)Wurkkos TD04 — Max candela: 21800 cdWurkkos TD04 — Weight: 80 g (2.82 oz)Wurkkos TD04 — Length: 137 mm (5.39 in)Wurkkos TD04 — Retail price: US$44.14Wurkkos TD04 — Max lumens: 3000 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$56.24Most expensive
US$44.14Cheapest
Weight
85 g (3.00 oz)Heaviest
80 g (2.82 oz)Lightest
Length
81 mm (3.19 in)Shortest
137 mm (5.39 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
1200 lmLowest output
3000 lmHighest output
Max candela
4700 cdLowest candela
21800 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
135 m (443 ft)Lowest
295 m (968 ft)Highest
Max runtime
57600 minLongest runtime
12960 minShortest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1×18350 rechargeable lithium-ion
21700 lithium-ion
Charging type
Proprietary magnetic USB charging
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX8
IP68
Impact resistance
Unknown
1.5 m (5 ft)
Material
Aluminum alloy
Aerospace-grade 6061 aluminum alloy with hard-anodized finish
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry (EDC)Outdoor activitiesSelf-defenseTactical use
Tactical missionsSecurity patrolsOutdoor survivalEveryday carryCampingHikingFishingHome backup lightingEmergency lighting
Common praise
Compact size with high outputVersatile dual-switch interfaceLong runtime in Moonlight modeGood build quality and pocket-friendlyIncludes proprietary rechargeable battery and magnetic charging
High maximum output of 3000 lumens with excellent measured 2300+ lumensGood build quality with aerospace-grade aluminum and anodized coatingConvenient USB-C charging with battery indicatorDual switch interface allowing mode memory and tactical useLightweight and compact size suitable for EDCDurability with IP68 waterproof rating and 1.5m impact resistance
Common complaints
Proprietary battery and charging limit battery interchangeabilityNo lanyard includedSome users may find proprietary charging inconvenient
Mechanical tail switch has some play and is not perfectly set into bodyTail switch prevents tailstanding due to switch protrusionUSB-C charging has some dropouts during charging but still acceptable

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online