← Back

Comparison Console

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable vs Wurkkos HD15

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos HD15 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative. Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Wurkkos HD15 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Wurkkos HD15 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Wurkkos HD15 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Wurkkos HD15 stands out as the shortest option for length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the longest option for length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Beam distance: 215 m (705 ft)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Max candela: 11525 cdSofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Weight: 71 g (2.50 oz)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Length: 112 mm (4.41 in)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Retail price: US$56Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Max lumens: 2100 lmWurkkos HD15 — Beam distance: 152 m (499 ft)Wurkkos HD15 — Max candela: 6884 cdWurkkos HD15 — Weight: 72 g (2.54 oz)Wurkkos HD15 — Length: 110 mm (4.33 in)Wurkkos HD15 — Retail price: US$50.75Wurkkos HD15 — Max lumens: 2000 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$56Most expensive
US$50.75Cheapest
Weight
71 g (2.50 oz)Lightest
72 g (2.54 oz)Heaviest
Length
112 mm (4.41 in)Longest
110 mm (4.33 in)Shortest
Output
Max lumens
2100 lmHighest output
2000 lmLowest output
Max candela
11525 cdHighest candela
6884 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
215 m (705 ft)Highest
152 m (499 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
Unknown
Unknown
Power & durability
Battery type
1x 18650 3.7v unprotected lithium battery (included)
1x 18650 lithium-ion rechargeable
Charging type
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP66
IP68
Impact resistance
1 m (3 ft)
1 m (3 ft)
Material
Aluminum
6061 aerospace grade aluminum alloy, HA Type III hard anodized
Use case profile
Best for
HuntingGeneral outdoor useEDCCampingHikingFishing
Outdoor activitiesCampingHikingFishingHuntingUtility useHeadlamp use
Common praise
High sustained brightnessGood balance of price and featuresVersatile beam types (spot, flood, red)Lightweight and compact for a triple channel headlampUSB-C charging convenientRegulated output for stable brightness
Versatile use as headlamp, handheld, or utility lightDual emitters provide both flood and spot beamsLightweight and smaller than the HD20 modelGood build quality with aerospace grade aluminum and quality anodizingIncludes useful accessories: headband, clip, lanyard, spare O-rings, charging cableMagnetic tailcap for hands-free utility useOnboard USB-C charging with reverse charging (powerbank) featureFlexible and aggressive thermal regulation for stable outputPackage includes both 18650 and 18350 cell tubes
Common complaints
No glass lens protection (optic exposed)Magnet weak on thin metalLacks lanyard attachment includedTailcap design hinders flat tailstanding with lanyard attached
Aggressive temperature regulation can limit maximum runtime at turboAttachment point for lanyard is rough and could benefit from chamferingHeadband is functional but not high-endNo knurling on body might reduce gripMeasured turbo lumens sometimes lower than claimedLacks tactile distinction on UI buttons which may confuse some users

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online