← Back

Comparison Console

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable vs Wurkkos HD15

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos HD15 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative. Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Wurkkos HD15 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Wurkkos HD15 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Wurkkos HD15 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Wurkkos HD15 stands out as the shortest option for length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable stands out as the longest option for length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Beam distance: 215 m (705 ft)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Max candela: 11525 cdSofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Weight: 71 g (2.50 oz)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Length: 112 mm (4.41 in)Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Retail price: US$56Sofirn HS42 Rechargeable — Max lumens: 2100 lmWurkkos HD15 — Beam distance: 152 m (499 ft)Wurkkos HD15 — Max candela: 6884 cdWurkkos HD15 — Weight: 72 g (2.54 oz)Wurkkos HD15 — Length: 110 mm (4.33 in)Wurkkos HD15 — Retail price: US$50.75Wurkkos HD15 — Max lumens: 2000 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$56Most expensive
US$50.75Cheapest
Weight
71 g (2.50 oz)Lightest
72 g (2.54 oz)Heaviest
Length
112 mm (4.41 in)Longest
110 mm (4.33 in)Shortest
Output
Max lumens
2100 lmHighest output
2000 lmLowest output
Max candela
11525 cdHighest candela
6884 cdLowest candela
Beam distance
215 m (705 ft)Highest
152 m (499 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
Unknown
Unknown
Power & durability
Battery type
1x 18650 3.7v unprotected lithium battery (included)
1x 18650 lithium-ion rechargeable
Charging type
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP66
IP68
Impact resistance
1 m (3 ft)
1 m (3 ft)
Material
Aluminum
6061 aerospace grade aluminum alloy, HA Type III hard anodized
Use case profile
Best for
▣Hunting▣General Outdoor Use▣EDC▣Camping▣Hiking▣Fishing
▣Outdoor Activities▣Camping▣Hiking▣Fishing▣Hunting▣Utility Use▣Headlamp Use
Common praise
✓High Sustained Brightness✓Good Balance Of Price And Features✓Versatile Beam Types (spot, Flood, Red)✓Lightweight And Compact For A Triple Channel Headlamp✓USB C Charging Convenient✓Regulated Output For Stable Brightness
✓Versatile Use As Headlamp, Handheld, Or Utility Light✓Dual Emitters Provide Both Flood And Spot Beams✓Lightweight And Smaller Than The Hd20 Model✓Good Build Quality With Aerospace Grade Aluminum And Quality Anodizing✓Includes Useful Accessories: Headband, Clip, Lanyard, Spare O Rings, Charging Cable✓Magnetic Tailcap For Hands Free Utility Use✓Onboard USB C Charging With Reverse Charging (powerbank) Feature✓Flexible And Aggressive Thermal Regulation For Stable Output✓Package Includes Both 18650 And 18350 Cell Tubes
Common complaints
⚠No Glass Lens Protection (optic Exposed)⚠Magnet Weak On Thin Metal⚠Lacks Lanyard Attachment Included⚠Tailcap Design Hinders Flat Tailstanding With Lanyard Attached
⚠Aggressive Temperature Regulation Can Limit Maximum Runtime At Turbo⚠Attachment Point For Lanyard Is Rough And Could Benefit From Chamfering⚠Headband Is Functional But Not High End⚠No Knurling On Body Might Reduce Grip⚠Measured Turbo Lumens Sometimes Lower Than Claimed⚠Lacks Tactile Distinction On Ui Buttons Which May Confuse Some Users

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online