← Back

Comparison Console

Sofirn LT1S Lantern vs Wurkkos TD01 SFT40

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Wurkkos TD01 SFT40 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TD01 SFT40 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TD01 SFT40 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 340% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Wurkkos TD01 SFT40 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Wurkkos TD01 SFT40 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 29% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 77% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Wurkkos TD01 SFT40 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 340% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 21% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Wurkkos TD01 SFT40 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Beam distance: 18 m (59 ft)Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Max candela: 82.5 cdSofirn LT1S Lantern — Weight: 338.9 g (11.95 oz)Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Length: 97.3 mm (3.83 in)Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Retail price: US$45.59Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Max lumens: 500 lmWurkkos TD01 SFT40 — Beam distance: 1039 m (3409 ft)Wurkkos TD01 SFT40 — Max candela: 270000 cdWurkkos TD01 SFT40 — Weight: 262 g (9.24 oz)Wurkkos TD01 SFT40 — Length: 152 mm (5.98 in)Wurkkos TD01 SFT40 — Retail price: US$41Wurkkos TD01 SFT40 — Max lumens: 2200 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$45.59Most expensive
US$41Cheapest
Weight
338.9 g (11.95 oz)Heaviest
262 g (9.24 oz)Lightest
Length
97.3 mm (3.83 in)Shortest
152 mm (5.98 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
500 lmLowest output
2200 lmHighest output
Max candela
82.5 cdLowest candela
270000 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
18 m (59 ft)Lowest
1039 m (3409 ft)Highest
Max runtime
3330 minShortest runtime
4200 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1x 21700 lithium-ion rechargeable
21700 Li-ion
Charging type
USB-C charging port (3A charge current)
USB-C on-board charging
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX8
IPX8
Impact resistance
Unknown
Unknown
Material
6061 aircraft-grade aluminum body with type 3 hard anodized coating, plastic diffuser
Aluminum body with aluminum bezel
Use case profile
Best for
CampingHikingEmergency lightingPower outagesGeneral outdoor use
Long-range throwTactical useOutdoor distance lighting
Common praise
Compact size and good portability for a lanternSmooth ramping and stepped modes with both warm and cool white lightIncludes red light modes for night useUSB-C onboard charging with powerbank outputSolid build quality with aluminum body and IPX8 waterproofingLong battery runtime up to over 500 hours on low moonlight mode
Powerful long-range throw with a large TIR opticGood value for its price pointUSB-C on-board charging with included 21700 batterySolid build quality for a budget flashlightDual-switch UI with tactical and general modes
Common complaints
No tripod mount or magnetic tailcapCharging port on top may be vulnerable to moistureTailcap threads stiff due to large springsUser interface can be a bit complex with multiple clicksNo direct shortcut to turbo from onMechanical lockout twist can be tricky
Tail switch is rubbery, protrudes too much, and prevents stable tailstandingSide switch feels mushy compared to other modelsSome PWM present on lower modesBeam has visible rings on walls but not noticeable outdoorsMode shortcut functions may be confusing or overcomplicated

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online