← Back

Comparison Console

Sofirn LT1S Lantern vs Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 51% gap from the closest alternative. Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 800% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 51% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 105% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 89% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 800% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 80% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 405% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Beam distance: 18 m (59 ft)Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Max candela: 82.5 cdSofirn LT1S Lantern — Weight: 338.9 g (11.95 oz)Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Length: 97.3 mm (3.83 in)Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Retail price: US$45.59Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Max lumens: 500 lmWurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 — Beam distance: 191 m (627 ft)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 — Max candela: 9150 cdWurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 — Weight: 165 g (5.82 oz)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 — Length: 122 mm (4.80 in)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 — Retail price: US$49.99Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 — Max lumens: 4500 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$45.59Cheapest
US$49.99Most expensive
Weight
338.9 g (11.95 oz)Heaviest
165 g (5.82 oz)Lightest
Length
97.3 mm (3.83 in)Shortest
122 mm (4.80 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
500 lmLowest output
4500 lmHighest output
Max candela
82.5 cdLowest candela
9150 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
18 m (59 ft)Lowest
191 m (627 ft)Highest
Max runtime
3330 minShortest runtime
16800 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1x 21700 lithium-ion rechargeable
21700 rechargeable li-ion
Charging type
USB-C charging port (3A charge current)
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX8
IP68
Impact resistance
Unknown
2 m (7 ft)
Material
6061 aircraft-grade aluminum body with type 3 hard anodized coating, plastic diffuser
Aviation-grade 6061 aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
CampingHikingEmergency lightingPower outagesGeneral outdoor use
Everyday carry (EDC)CampingOutdoor explorationEmergency situations
Common praise
Compact size and good portability for a lanternSmooth ramping and stepped modes with both warm and cool white lightIncludes red light modes for night useUSB-C onboard charging with powerbank outputSolid build quality with aluminum body and IPX8 waterproofingLong battery runtime up to over 500 hours on low moonlight mode
High brightness and stable outputGood build quality and gripIncluded 21700 battery and accessoriesMagnetic tailcap feature for versatile mountingUSB-C charging with reverse charging feature
Common complaints
No tripod mount or magnetic tailcapCharging port on top may be vulnerable to moistureTailcap threads stiff due to large springsUser interface can be a bit complex with multiple clicksNo direct shortcut to turbo from onMechanical lockout twist can be tricky
Aggressive knurling can be uncomfortableSlight play in electronic switch coverSome confusion regarding LED model designation in marketing

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online