← Back

Comparison Console

Sofirn LT1S Lantern vs Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 51% gap from the closest alternative. Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 800% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 51% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 105% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 89% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 800% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 80% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 405% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Beam distance: 18 m (59 ft)Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Max candela: 82.5 cdSofirn LT1S Lantern — Weight: 338.9 g (11.95 oz)Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Length: 97.3 mm (3.83 in)Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Retail price: US$45.59Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Max lumens: 500 lmWurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 — Beam distance: 191 m (627 ft)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 — Max candela: 9150 cdWurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 — Weight: 165 g (5.82 oz)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 — Length: 122 mm (4.80 in)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 — Retail price: US$49.99Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.2 — Max lumens: 4500 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$45.59Cheapest
US$49.99Most expensive
Weight
338.9 g (11.95 oz)Heaviest
165 g (5.82 oz)Lightest
Length
97.3 mm (3.83 in)Shortest
122 mm (4.80 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
500 lmLowest output
4500 lmHighest output
Max candela
82.5 cdLowest candela
9150 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
18 m (59 ft)Lowest
191 m (627 ft)Highest
Max runtime
3330 minShortest runtime
16800 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1x 21700 lithium-ion rechargeable
21700 rechargeable li-ion
Charging type
USB-C charging port (3A charge current)
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX8
IP68
Impact resistance
Unknown
2 m (7 ft)
Material
6061 aircraft-grade aluminum body with type 3 hard anodized coating, plastic diffuser
Aviation-grade 6061 aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
▣Camping▣Hiking▣Emergency Lighting▣Power Outages▣General Outdoor Use
▣Everyday Carry (EDC)▣Camping▣Outdoor Exploration▣Emergency Situations
Common praise
✓Compact Size And Good Portability For A Lantern✓Smooth Ramping And Stepped Modes With Both Warm And Cool White Light✓Includes Red Light Modes For Night Use✓USB C Onboard Charging With Powerbank Output✓Solid Build Quality With Aluminum Body And Ipx8 Waterproofing✓Long Battery Runtime Up To Over 500 Hours On Low Moonlight Mode
✓High Brightness And Stable Output✓Good Build Quality And Grip✓Included 21700 Battery And Accessories✓Magnetic Tailcap Feature For Versatile Mounting✓USB C Charging With Reverse Charging Feature
Common complaints
⚠No Tripod Mount Or Magnetic Tailcap⚠Charging Port On Top May Be Vulnerable To Moisture⚠Tailcap Threads Stiff Due To Large Springs⚠User Interface Can Be A Bit Complex With Multiple Clicks⚠No Direct Shortcut To Turbo From On⚠Mechanical Lockout Twist Can Be Tricky
⚠Aggressive Knurling Can Be Uncomfortable⚠Slight Play In Electronic Switch Cover⚠Some Confusion Regarding LED Model Designation In Marketing

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online