← Back

Comparison Console

Sofirn LT1S Lantern vs Wurkkos TS23

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Wurkkos TS23 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 32% gap from the closest alternative. Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TS23 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 900% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Wurkkos TS23 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Wurkkos TS23 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 32% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 46% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 90% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Wurkkos TS23 stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 900% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Wurkkos TS23 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Sofirn LT1S Lantern stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Beam distance: 18 m (59 ft)Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Max candela: 82.5 cdSofirn LT1S Lantern — Weight: 338.9 g (11.95 oz)Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Length: 97.3 mm (3.83 in)Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Retail price: US$45.59Sofirn LT1S Lantern — Max lumens: 500 lmWurkkos TS23 — Beam distance: 482 m (1581 ft)Wurkkos TS23 — Max candela: 58083 cdWurkkos TS23 — Weight: 232 g (8.18 oz)Wurkkos TS23 — Length: 138 mm (5.43 in)Wurkkos TS23 — Retail price: US$48Wurkkos TS23 — Max lumens: 5000 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$45.59Cheapest
US$48Most expensive
Weight
338.9 g (11.95 oz)Heaviest
232 g (8.18 oz)Lightest
Length
97.3 mm (3.83 in)Shortest
138 mm (5.43 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
500 lmLowest output
5000 lmHighest output
Max candela
82.5 cdLowest candela
58083 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
18 m (59 ft)Lowest
482 m (1581 ft)Highest
Max runtime
3330 minLongest runtime
2700 minShortest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1x 21700 lithium-ion rechargeable
1x21700 rechargeable lithium-ion
Charging type
USB-C charging port (3A charge current)
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX8
IP68
Impact resistance
Unknown
Unknown
Material
6061 aircraft-grade aluminum body with type 3 hard anodized coating, plastic diffuser
Aerospace-grade 6061 aluminum with hard-anodized finish and reinforced tungsten steel beads bezel
Use case profile
Best for
CampingHikingEmergency lightingPower outagesGeneral outdoor use
Tactical useSearch and rescueOutdoor adventuresNight hikingCampingHome emergencies
Common praise
Compact size and good portability for a lanternSmooth ramping and stepped modes with both warm and cool white lightIncludes red light modes for night useUSB-C onboard charging with powerbank outputSolid build quality with aluminum body and IPX8 waterproofingLong battery runtime up to over 500 hours on low moonlight mode
High output brightnessGood build quality for priceVersatile dual UI with stepped and tactical modesUSB-C chargingIncluded 5000mAh 21700 battery
Common complaints
No tripod mount or magnetic tailcapCharging port on top may be vulnerable to moistureTailcap threads stiff due to large springsUser interface can be a bit complex with multiple clicksNo direct shortcut to turbo from onMechanical lockout twist can be tricky
Tail switch has a slightly mushy feelNot ideal for pocket carry due to size and weightMoonlight mode is relatively bright compared to typical moonlight

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online