← Back

Comparison Console

Wurkkos FC11 LH351D vs Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos FC11 LH351D stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative. Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 246% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Wurkkos FC11 LH351D stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Wurkkos FC11 LH351D stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Wurkkos FC11 LH351D stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 71% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 246% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Wurkkos FC11 LH351D stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Wurkkos FC11 LH351D — Beam distance: 144 m (472 ft)Wurkkos FC11 LH351D — Max candela: 5200 cdWurkkos FC11 LH351D — Weight: 112 g (3.95 oz)Wurkkos FC11 LH351D — Length: 116 mm (4.57 in)Wurkkos FC11 LH351D — Retail price: US$30Wurkkos FC11 LH351D — Impact resistance: 1 m (3 ft)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Beam distance: 191 m (627 ft)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Max candela: 9150 cdWurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Weight: 95 g (3.35 oz)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Length: 122 mm (4.80 in)Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Retail price: US$40Wurkkos TS22 XHP70.3 HI — Impact resistance: 2 m (7 ft)Beam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceImpact resistance
Price & carry
Retail price
US$30Cheapest
US$40Most expensive
Weight
112 g (3.95 oz)Heaviest
95 g (3.35 oz)Lightest
Length
116 mm (4.57 in)Shortest
122 mm (4.80 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
1300 lmLowest output
4500 lmHighest output
Max candela
5200 cdLowest candela
9150 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
144 m (472 ft)Lowest
191 m (627 ft)Highest
Max runtime
16500 minShortest runtime
16800 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
1x18650 Li-ion
21700
Charging type
USB-C DC 5V 1A
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX-7
IP68
Impact resistance
1 m (3 ft)Lowest
2 m (7 ft)Highest
Material
6061 aluminium alloy, hard anodized type III
Aviation-grade 6061 aluminum alloy
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryGeneral purpose useOutdoor activities like camping, hiking, fishing, huntingUsers wanting high CRI LED and USB-C charging
Everyday carry (EDC)General outdoor useCampingEmergency use
Common praise
High CRI 5000K Samsung LH351D LED provides quality lightUSB-C charging with included cableStrong magnetic tailcapErgonomic design with good grip and button usabilityGood value for priceIncluded battery and accessoriesLong maximum runtimeRamping and stepped UI modes provide user choice
High output with stable brightnessGood grip with unique ridged body designIncludes battery and USB-C charging cableMagnetic tailcap for mountingGood waterproof rating and durability
Common complaints
Non-regulated driver leading to turbo stepdownNo shortcut to low mode in default UIUSB-C charging implementation requires USB-A to USB-C cable only (no USB-C to USB-C)Pocket clip is friction fit and not deep carryMinor battery rattle with protection choice
UI can be less intuitive with minor quirksAggressive knurling pattern can be uncomfortablePackaging and documentation confusing about LED modelSwitch has some play and may require deliberate presses

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online