← Back

Comparison Console

Benchmade AFCK vs Spyderco Efficient

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Efficient stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 46% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 46% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Benchmade AFCK stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 85% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Benchmade AFCK stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Benchmade AFCK stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 30% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Benchmade AFCK stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 34% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Benchmade AFCK — Blade length: 102 mm (4.02 in)Benchmade AFCK — Overall length: 235 mm (9.25 in)Benchmade AFCK — Closed length: 135 mm (5.31 in)Benchmade AFCK — Blade thickness: 3.175 mm (0.13 in)Benchmade AFCK — Weight: 119.7 g (4.22 oz)Benchmade AFCK — Retail price: US$120Spyderco Efficient — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Spyderco Efficient — Overall length: 180 mm (7.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Closed length: 104 mm (4.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Spyderco Efficient — Weight: 116 g (4.09 oz)Spyderco Efficient — Retail price: US$65Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$120Most expensive
US$65Cheapest
Weight
119.7 g (4.22 oz)Heaviest
116 g (4.09 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
102 mm (4.02 in)Longest
76 mm (2.99 in)Shortest
Overall length
235 mm (9.25 in)Longest
180 mm (7.09 in)Shortest
Closed length
135 mm (5.31 in)Longest
104 mm (4.09 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.175 mm (0.13 in)Thickest
3 mm (0.12 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
M2 tool steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
G-10 handle scales with stainless steel liner
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Black finish on blade, stonewashed pivot screws
Satin or Black oxide coated blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Thumb Hole
Spyderco Trademark Round Hole for one-handed opening
Clip type
Steel pocket clip (tip down)
Reversible hourglass clip, ambidextrous tip-up carry
Use case profile
Best for
EDC utilitySelf defenseCollectors
Everyday carryTactical useValue-oriented users
Not best for
!Left hand users (clip and lock are right hand oriented)
Unknown
Common praise
Very sharp blade edgeComfortable, ergonomic handleReliable liner lockDurable constructionGood for utility and self defense
Good value for the priceSolid build quality for a budget bladeComfortable ergonomic handleEffective and secure liner lock mechanismReversible clip for versatile carry options
Common complaints
Handle flex with G-10 scales (addressed in later models or by replacing scales with aluminum)Heavier compared to some other folding knivesRight hand only clip and lock
Blade steel is lower-end (8Cr13MoV) compared to high-end knives