Comparison Console
Benchmade Bedlam vs Spyderco Techno 2
EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Spyderco Techno 2 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 52% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Techno 2 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Spyderco Techno 2 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.
Benchmade Bedlam stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Techno 2 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 52% gap from the closest alternative.
Benchmade Bedlam stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 109% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Techno 2 stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 41% gap from the closest alternative.
Benchmade Bedlam stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 68% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Techno 2 stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.
Benchmade Bedlam stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 54% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$450Most expensive
US$400Cheapest
Weight
201.61 g (7.11 oz)Heaviest
96.39 g (3.40 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
100.33 mm (3.95 in)Longest
65 mm (2.56 in)Shortest
Overall length
246.83 mm (9.72 in)Longest
152 mm (5.98 in)Shortest
Closed length
146.3 mm (5.76 in)Longest
87 mm (3.43 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.18 mm (0.13 in)Thinnest
3.5 mm (0.14 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
154CM stainless steel
CTS-XHP
Handle material
G-10 Laminate
6AL-4V Titanium
Finish
Satin or coated blade options
Stonewash
Lock type
AXIS Lock/Crossbar Lock
Frame Lock
Opening method
Manual with thumb studs or automatic with Auto AXIS mechanism
Thumb Hole
Clip type
Deep carry reversible tip-up steel pocket clip
Reversible deep-pocket wire clip
Use case profile
Best for
Tactical UseEveryday CarryCutting Through Resistant MaterialsHooking And Slicing TasksUsers Needing Ambidextrous Operation
Everyday CarryHeavy Duty Folding Knife Use
Not best for
Precision Cutting TasksUsers Preferring Lightweight Knives For All Day Carry
Unknown
Common praise
Strong And Durable Blade And Build QualityEffective Slicing And Hooking Performance With Scimitar BladeComfortable And Secure Grip With Textured Sculpted G10 HandleReliable Axis Lock Mechanism Is Ambidextrous And SmoothDeep Carry Reversible Pocket Clip Allows Subtle Carry Despite Large Size
Excellent Build Quality And Edge RetentionVersatile And Compact DesignStrong And Reliable Frame LockAmbidextrous Carry Options
Common complaints
Heavier Than Some Everyday Carry KnivesMay Feel Bulky Or Large In HandPotential Difficulty Sharpening Scimitar Blade Shape
Unknown
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online