← Back

Comparison Console

Benchmade Casbah vs Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Benchmade Casbah stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Benchmade Casbah stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Benchmade Casbah stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Benchmade Casbah stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Benchmade Casbah — Blade length: 86.36 mm (3.40 in)Benchmade Casbah — Overall length: 198.12 mm (7.80 in)Benchmade Casbah — Closed length: 111.76 mm (4.40 in)Benchmade Casbah — Weight: 97.24 g (3.43 oz)Benchmade Casbah — Retail price: US$190Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Blade length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Overall length: 183 mm (7.20 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Weight: 77.99 g (2.75 oz)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Retail price: US$169.95Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$190Most expensive
US$169.95Cheapest
Weight
97.24 g (3.43 oz)Heaviest
77.99 g (2.75 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
86.36 mm (3.40 in)Longest
81 mm (3.19 in)Shortest
Overall length
198.12 mm (7.80 in)Longest
183 mm (7.20 in)Shortest
Closed length
111.76 mm (4.40 in)Longest
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2.9 mm (0.11 in)
Unknown
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
CPM S30V stainless steel (58-60 HRC)
VG-10 Stainless Steel
Handle material
Blue or black textured Grivory (glass fiber reinforced nylon co-polymer)
Blue Almite anodized aluminum with steel liners and backspacer
Finish
Satin finish or black Cerakote ceramic coating
Satin
Lock type
Push-button with front-mounted slide safety (plunge lock)
Liner Lock
Opening method
Side-opening automatic, push-button activated coil spring
Thumb Hole
Clip type
Deep carry, reversible tip-up pocket clip
Reversible steel pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry (EDC)Duty useTactical use
Everyday CarryCollector
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Lightweight and excellent ergonomicsSuperior edge retention and corrosion resistance of CPM S30V blade steelFast, smooth, and reliable automatic deploymentComfortable, secure grip with textured Grivory handle and jimpingDeep carry reversible tip-up pocket clip for versatile carryMade in the USA with Benchmade's Lifetime Warranty and Lifesharp sharpening
High-quality VG-10 steel bladeCompact and light design at 2.75 oz.Collector's favorite with limited production
Common complaints
Some users find the pocket clip only tip-up carry limitingForce of blade deployment considered moderate by some usersTexturing on the backside of the handle could be improved
Unknown