← Back

Comparison Console

Benchmade Osborne 943 vs Spyderco Amalgam

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Benchmade Osborne 943 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative. Benchmade Osborne 943 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Benchmade Osborne 943 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Amalgam stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 50% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Benchmade Osborne 943 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Amalgam stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 49% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Benchmade Osborne 943 stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Amalgam stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Benchmade Osborne 943 stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Amalgam stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Benchmade Osborne 943 — Blade length: 86.4 mm (3.40 in)Benchmade Osborne 943 — Overall length: 200 mm (7.87 in)Benchmade Osborne 943 — Closed length: 114 mm (4.49 in)Benchmade Osborne 943 — Blade thickness: 2.9 mm (0.11 in)Benchmade Osborne 943 — Weight: 82.15 g (2.90 oz)Benchmade Osborne 943 — Retail price: US$220Spyderco Amalgam — Blade length: 96.52 mm (3.80 in)Spyderco Amalgam — Overall length: 226.06 mm (8.90 in)Spyderco Amalgam — Closed length: 129.54 mm (5.10 in)Spyderco Amalgam — Blade thickness: 3.51 mm (0.14 in)Spyderco Amalgam — Weight: 122.08 g (4.31 oz)Spyderco Amalgam — Retail price: US$330Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$220Cheapest
US$330Most expensive
Weight
82.15 g (2.90 oz)Lightest
122.08 g (4.31 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
86.4 mm (3.40 in)Shortest
96.52 mm (3.80 in)Longest
Overall length
200 mm (7.87 in)Shortest
226.06 mm (8.90 in)Longest
Closed length
114 mm (4.49 in)Shortest
129.54 mm (5.10 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.9 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
3.51 mm (0.14 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
CPM S30V
CPM S30V
Handle material
6061-T6 aluminum with 410 stainless steel liners and color anodized titanium back spacer
Carbon fiber/G-10 laminate with nested, skeletonized stainless steel liners
Finish
Black anodized aluminum handle, black finish blade (options include black, satin)
Full-flat grind
Lock type
AXIS lock (crossbar lock)
Compression Lock
Opening method
Ambidextrous thumb stud opener
Index-finger flipper opener and Trademark Round Hole
Clip type
Reversible (tip-up) carry clip
Four-position pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryCampingHikingOutdoor activities
Everyday carryHuntingCampingHikingSurvivalTactical use
Not best for
!Heavy-duty tasks
Unknown
Common praise
Strong and durable bladeBalanced and light designSuitable for right and left hand usersSmooth and quick openingReliable AXIS lock mechanism
Smooth opening action with ball-bearing washersStrong and reliable Compression LockLightweight yet durable handle constructionAmbidextrous carry options with four-position clip
Common complaints
Handle can feel too thin or slimAluminum handle can scratch easilyBlade hardness can make sharpening difficult for beginnersThumb stud placement may feel awkward for some users
Unknown