← Back

Comparison Console

Benchmade 960 vs Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Benchmade 960 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Benchmade 960 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Benchmade 960 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Benchmade 960 stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Benchmade 960 stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Benchmade 960 — Blade length: 79.25 mm (3.12 in)Benchmade 960 — Overall length: 184.9 mm (7.28 in)Benchmade 960 — Closed length: 105.7 mm (4.16 in)Benchmade 960 — Weight: 64.1 g (2.26 oz)Benchmade 960 — Retail price: US$200Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Blade length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Overall length: 183 mm (7.20 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Weight: 77.99 g (2.75 oz)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Retail price: US$169.95Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$200Most expensive
US$169.95Cheapest
Weight
64.1 g (2.26 oz)Lightest
77.99 g (2.75 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
79.25 mm (3.12 in)Shortest
81 mm (3.19 in)Longest
Overall length
184.9 mm (7.28 in)Longest
183 mm (7.20 in)Shortest
Closed length
105.7 mm (4.16 in)Shortest
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.54 mm (0.10 in)
Unknown
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
D2 Tool Steel
VG-10 Stainless Steel
Handle material
Red anodized aluminum with black G10 inlay
Blue Almite anodized aluminum with steel liners and backspacer
Finish
Red anodized aluminum handles, polished stainless steel clip, anodized blue titanium back spacer
Satin
Lock type
AXIS Lock/Crossbar Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Thumb stud, flick of the wrist
Thumb Hole
Clip type
Reversible stainless steel tip-up
Reversible steel pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
EDC (Every Day Carry)Collectors
Everyday CarryCollector
Not best for
!Heavy hard use due to slick handles, lack of jimping
Unknown
Common praise
Smooth and reliable Axis lock mechanismAttractive red anodized aluminum handle with black G10 inlayLightweight at about 2.26 ozGood quality D2 tool steel blade
High-quality VG-10 steel bladeCompact and light design at 2.75 oz.Collector's favorite with limited production
Common complaints
Handle can be slick and lacks texture for gripBlade sharpening is more challenging due to D2 steel
Unknown