← Back

Comparison Console

Benchmade PSK vs Spyderco Slysz Bowie

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative. Benchmade PSK stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Benchmade PSK stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Benchmade PSK stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Benchmade PSK stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Benchmade PSK stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Benchmade PSK — Blade length: 88 mm (3.46 in)Benchmade PSK — Overall length: 213 mm (8.39 in)Benchmade PSK — Closed length: 126 mm (4.96 in)Benchmade PSK — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Benchmade PSK — Weight: 150.95 g (5.32 oz)Benchmade PSK — Retail price: US$400Spyderco Slysz Bowie — Blade length: 87 mm (3.43 in)Spyderco Slysz Bowie — Overall length: 198 mm (7.80 in)Spyderco Slysz Bowie — Closed length: 111 mm (4.37 in)Spyderco Slysz Bowie — Blade thickness: 3.5 mm (0.14 in)Spyderco Slysz Bowie — Weight: 122 g (4.30 oz)Spyderco Slysz Bowie — Retail price: US$450Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$400Cheapest
US$450Most expensive
Weight
150.95 g (5.32 oz)Heaviest
122 g (4.30 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
88 mm (3.46 in)Longest
87 mm (3.43 in)Shortest
Overall length
213 mm (8.39 in)Longest
198 mm (7.80 in)Shortest
Closed length
126 mm (4.96 in)Longest
111 mm (4.37 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)Thinnest
3.5 mm (0.14 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
CPM MagnaCut
M390
Handle material
G-10 or Carbon Fiber with G-10 bolsters
Titanium
Finish
Cerakote coating
Satin / stonewashed (varies by version)
Lock type
AXIS Assist
Frame lock
Opening method
Spring-assisted opening with thumb-studs
Thumb Hole
Clip type
Reversible deep-carry pocket clip, tip-up, left or right hand
Wire clip, reversible deep-pocket
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry▣Survival▣Bushcraft▣Outdoor Use▣Camping
▣Everyday Carry▣Medium Sized Folding Knife Users▣Users Desiring A Premium Titanium Framelock Folder
Not best for
!Heavy Chopping Or Log Splitting!Very Small Hand Use
!Heavy Duty Cutting Chores!Users Needing Large Fixed Blades
Common praise
✓Strong, Corrosion Resistant Magnacut Steel Blade With Excellent Edge Retention✓Robust Axis Assist Locking Mechanism With Spring Assisted Opening✓Full Steel Liners And G 10 Or Carbon Fiber Handle Scales Provide Strength And Grip✓Includes Ferro Rod Striking Choil For Fire Starting✓Lifetime Warranty And Lifesharp Maintenance Service
✓High Quality Manufacturing✓Comfortable Ergonomics✓Smooth Deployment✓Refined Frame Lock✓Good Balance And Medium Size✓Excellent Blade Steel (M390 Or Cts Xhp)✓Suitable For Everyday Carry
Common complaints
⚠Two Hand Closure May Be Inconvenient For Some Users⚠Blade Thickness And Assisted Mechanism May Not Excel In Hard Use Tasks Like Log Splitting⚠Size And Weight May Be Too Large For Small Hands
⚠Higher Price Point⚠Some Design Changes Less Desirable Compared To Original Model⚠Original Stonewashed Finish Replaced By Satin In Newer Version⚠Rough Edges At Blade Opening Hole And Jimping On New Version⚠Long Handle May Feel Disproportionate For Some Users

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online