← Back

Comparison Console

Benchmade Rift vs Spyderco Tusk

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Tusk stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative. Benchmade Rift stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Benchmade Rift stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Tusk stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Tusk stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Benchmade Rift stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Tusk stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Benchmade Rift stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Tusk stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Benchmade Rift stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 55% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Benchmade Rift — Blade length: 93.2 mm (3.67 in)Benchmade Rift — Overall length: 210 mm (8.27 in)Benchmade Rift — Closed length: 117 mm (4.61 in)Benchmade Rift — Blade thickness: 2.9 mm (0.11 in)Benchmade Rift — Weight: 136 g (4.80 oz)Benchmade Rift — Retail price: US$225.25Spyderco Tusk — Blade length: 60 mm (2.36 in)Spyderco Tusk — Overall length: 166 mm (6.54 in)Spyderco Tusk — Closed length: 106 mm (4.17 in)Spyderco Tusk — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Spyderco Tusk — Weight: 119 g (4.20 oz)Spyderco Tusk — Retail price: US$230Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$225.25Cheapest
US$230Most expensive
Weight
136 g (4.80 oz)Heaviest
119 g (4.20 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
93.2 mm (3.67 in)Longest
60 mm (2.36 in)Shortest
Overall length
210 mm (8.27 in)Longest
166 mm (6.54 in)Shortest
Closed length
117 mm (4.61 in)Longest
106 mm (4.17 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2.9 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
154CM stainless steel
LC200N
Handle material
G-10 Laminate
Titanium
Finish
Satin, blasted, coated options
Hollow grind
Lock type
AXIS Lock/Crossbar Lock
Reeve Integral Lock (R.I.L.)
Opening method
Thumb Stud
Unknown
Clip type
Reversible steel pocket clip, side to side mounted, tip-up, ambidextrous
Ambidextrous tip-up
Use case profile
Best for
▣Tactical Tasks▣EDC▣Emergency Defense▣Collectors
▣Maritime And Nautical Applications▣Everyday Carry▣Knot Loosening And Shackle Manipulation
Not best for
!Lighter Weight Preference!Precision Cutting Tasks
Unknown
Common praise
✓Strong And Reliable Design✓Comfortable G10 Handle✓Smooth And Secure Axis Lock✓Ambidextrous Opening And Carrying✓Solid Build Quality✓Excellent Blade Design And Steel Choice
✓Excellent Corrosion Resistance✓Highly Functional Marlinspike Tool✓Strong And Secure Locking Mechanisms✓Precision Machined Titanium Handle✓Versatile For Nautical Tasks
Common complaints
⚠Heavier Weight May Be An Issue For Some Users⚠Thumb Stud Can Be Difficult To Operate With Gloves⚠Some May Find Pocket Clip Too Tight⚠Not Ideal For Heavy Carving Or Precision Cutting Tasks
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online