← Back

Comparison Console

CIVIVI Badlands Vagabond vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CIVIVI Badlands Vagabond stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CIVIVI Badlands Vagabond stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CIVIVI Badlands Vagabond stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI Badlands Vagabond stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI Badlands Vagabond stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CIVIVI Badlands Vagabond — Blade length: 82.6 mm (3.25 in)CIVIVI Badlands Vagabond — Overall length: 190 mm (7.48 in)CIVIVI Badlands Vagabond — Closed length: 107.4 mm (4.23 in)CIVIVI Badlands Vagabond — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)CIVIVI Badlands Vagabond — Weight: 84.1 g (2.97 oz)CIVIVI Badlands Vagabond — Retail price: US$47Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$47Most expensive
US$43.99Cheapest
Weight
84.1 g (2.97 oz)Lightest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
82.6 mm (3.25 in)Longest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Shortest
Overall length
190 mm (7.48 in)Longest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Shortest
Closed length
107.4 mm (4.23 in)Longest
105 mm (4.13 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
9Cr18MoV
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Fiber-glass Reinforced Nylon
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Black Stonewashed
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Flipper & Thumb Stud
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Tip-Up, L/R
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday Carry (EDC)Tactical UseCamping
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Lightweight and comfortable FRN handleGood blade steel 9Cr18MoVSmooth and snappy flipping actionAffordable price point
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Discontinued so availability limitedNo specialized or premium steel options in standard model
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online