← Back

Comparison Console

CIVIVI Bhaltair vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 45% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CIVIVI Bhaltair stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 45% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

CIVIVI Bhaltair stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 83% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI Bhaltair stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 21% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI Bhaltair stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CIVIVI Bhaltair — Blade length: 101 mm (3.98 in)CIVIVI Bhaltair — Overall length: 231.7 mm (9.12 in)CIVIVI Bhaltair — Closed length: 130.7 mm (5.15 in)CIVIVI Bhaltair — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)CIVIVI Bhaltair — Weight: 165.8 g (5.85 oz)CIVIVI Bhaltair — Retail price: US$48.75Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$48.75Most expensive
US$43.99Cheapest
Weight
165.8 g (5.85 oz)Heaviest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
101 mm (3.98 in)Longest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Shortest
Overall length
231.7 mm (9.12 in)Longest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Shortest
Closed length
130.7 mm (5.15 in)Longest
105 mm (4.13 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
14C28N
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Coarse G10
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Black
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Flipper & Thumb Stud
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Tip-Up, Left/Right
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
EDC KnivesTactical KnivesCamping Knives
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Affordable priceGood blade steelErgonomic G10 handleSmooth action
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Discontinued modelLimited availability
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online