← Back

Comparison Console

CIVIVI BullTusk vs Spyderco Efficient

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Efficient stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CIVIVI BullTusk stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

CIVIVI BullTusk stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI BullTusk stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI BullTusk stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CIVIVI BullTusk — Blade length: 88.4 mm (3.48 in)CIVIVI BullTusk — Overall length: 206.7 mm (8.14 in)CIVIVI BullTusk — Closed length: 118.3 mm (4.66 in)CIVIVI BullTusk — Weight: 126.5 g (4.46 oz)CIVIVI BullTusk — Retail price: US$74CIVIVI BullTusk — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Spyderco Efficient — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Spyderco Efficient — Overall length: 180 mm (7.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Closed length: 104 mm (4.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Weight: 116 g (4.09 oz)Spyderco Efficient — Retail price: US$65Spyderco Efficient — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail priceBlade thickness
Price & carry
Retail price
US$74Most expensive
US$65Cheapest
Weight
126.5 g (4.46 oz)Heaviest
116 g (4.09 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
88.4 mm (3.48 in)Longest
76 mm (2.99 in)Shortest
Overall length
206.7 mm (8.14 in)Longest
180 mm (7.09 in)Shortest
Closed length
118.3 mm (4.66 in)Longest
104 mm (4.09 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)
3 mm (0.12 in)
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
14C28N
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Coarse G10
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Black Stonewashed
Satin or Black oxide coated blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Flipper & Thumb Hole
Spyderco Trademark Round Hole for one-handed opening
Clip type
Tip-Up, L/R
Reversible hourglass clip, ambidextrous tip-up carry
Use case profile
Best for
▣EDC▣Camping▣Collector▣Hunting▣Tactical
▣Everyday Carry▣Tactical Use▣Value Oriented Users
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
✓Good Blade Steel For The Price✓Solid Liner Lock Mechanism✓Comfortable And Durable G10 Handle✓Convenient Flipper And Thumb Hole Opening
✓Good Value For The Price✓Solid Build Quality For A Budget Blade✓Comfortable Ergonomic Handle✓Effective And Secure Liner Lock Mechanism✓Reversible Clip For Versatile Carry Options
Common complaints
⚠Discontinued Model May Be Hard To Find⚠No Major Complaints Reported
⚠Blade Steel Is Lower End (8cr13mov) Compared To High End Knives

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online