← Back

Comparison Console

CIVIVI Courser vs Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative. CIVIVI Courser stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 53% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

CIVIVI Courser stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 53% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 112% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

CIVIVI Courser stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI Courser stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI Courser stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CIVIVI Courser — Blade length: 88 mm (3.46 in)CIVIVI Courser — Overall length: 204 mm (8.03 in)CIVIVI Courser — Closed length: 116 mm (4.57 in)CIVIVI Courser — Weight: 96 g (3.39 oz)CIVIVI Courser — Retail price: US$80Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Blade length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Overall length: 183 mm (7.20 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Weight: 77.99 g (2.75 oz)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Retail price: US$169.95Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$80Cheapest
US$169.95Most expensive
Weight
96 g (3.39 oz)Heaviest
77.99 g (2.75 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
88 mm (3.46 in)Longest
81 mm (3.19 in)Shortest
Overall length
204 mm (8.03 in)Longest
183 mm (7.20 in)Shortest
Closed length
116 mm (4.57 in)Longest
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.2 mm (0.13 in)
Unknown
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
VG-10 Stainless Steel
VG-10 Stainless Steel
Handle material
G-10 Laminate
Blue Almite anodized aluminum with steel liners and backspacer
Finish
Satin
Satin
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Flipper
Thumb Hole
Clip type
Tip-Up Titanium Pocket Clip
Reversible steel pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday CarryEDCCamping KnivesTactical KnivesCollector Knives
Everyday CarryCollector
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Smooth opening action due to ceramic ball bearings and flipperStrong liner lock mechanismGood blade sharpness and edge retentionAffordable price point with quality materials
High-quality VG-10 steel bladeCompact and light design at 2.75 oz.Collector's favorite with limited production
Common complaints
Handle scales are flat and not contoured, may feel less ergonomicGold colored liners inset close to edge may be prone to chipping if dropped
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online