← Back

Comparison Console

CIVIVI Elementum vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CIVIVI Elementum stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CIVIVI Elementum stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CIVIVI Elementum stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CIVIVI Elementum stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CIVIVI Elementum stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CIVIVI Elementum — Blade length: 75.2 mm (2.96 in)CIVIVI Elementum — Overall length: 177.6 mm (6.99 in)CIVIVI Elementum — Closed length: 102.4 mm (4.03 in)CIVIVI Elementum — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)CIVIVI Elementum — Weight: 82 g (2.89 oz)CIVIVI Elementum — Retail price: US$50.15Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$50.15Most expensive
US$43.99Cheapest
Weight
82 g (2.89 oz)Lightest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
75.2 mm (2.96 in)Shortest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Longest
Overall length
177.6 mm (6.99 in)Shortest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Longest
Closed length
102.4 mm (4.03 in)Shortest
105 mm (4.13 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
D2 steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
G-10 Laminate
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Black Stonewash or satin finish (depends on variation)
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Flipper
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Deep carry stainless steel pocket clip
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry (EDC)
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Smooth deploymentGood blade steel with toughness and edge retentionComfortable and secure handle gripCompact and lightweight for everyday carryGood value for price
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Unknown
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online