← Back

Comparison Console

CIVIVI Hooligan vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CIVIVI Hooligan stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

CIVIVI Hooligan stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CIVIVI Hooligan stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CIVIVI Hooligan stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CIVIVI Hooligan — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)CIVIVI Hooligan — Overall length: 179 mm (7.05 in)CIVIVI Hooligan — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)CIVIVI Hooligan — Weight: 92 g (3.25 oz)CIVIVI Hooligan — Retail price: US$54CIVIVI Hooligan — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Blade lengthOverall lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail priceClosed length
Price & carry
Retail price
US$54Most expensive
US$43.99Cheapest
Weight
92 g (3.25 oz)Heaviest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
76 mm (2.99 in)Shortest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Longest
Overall length
179 mm (7.05 in)Shortest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Longest
Closed length
105 mm (4.13 in)
105 mm (4.13 in)
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
D2
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Micarta
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Satin
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Thumb Stud
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Tip-up reversible left/right
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryOutdoor useSurvivalHuntingBushcraft
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Durable handle materialsGood edge retentionSmooth flipping actionLightweight and compactReversible deep carry clip
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Right-handed orientation primarilyNo sheath included
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online