Comparison Console
CIVIVI Qubit vs Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter
EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative. CIVIVI Qubit stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
CIVIVI Qubit stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.
CIVIVI Qubit stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.
CIVIVI Qubit stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.
CIVIVI Qubit stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$78.7Cheapest
US$80Most expensive
Weight
80 g (2.82 oz)Heaviest
79 g (2.79 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
75.7 mm (2.98 in)Shortest
80 mm (3.15 in)Longest
Overall length
182.6 mm (7.19 in)Shortest
200 mm (7.87 in)Longest
Closed length
106.9 mm (4.21 in)Shortest
115 mm (4.53 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.3 mm (0.09 in)Thinnest
4 mm (0.16 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
14C28N
D2 High-Speed Steel
Handle material
Aluminum
T6061 Aviation Aluminum
Finish
Black Stonewashed
Type II / Type III Hard Anodize, Sandblasted and Brushed (black handle), Mirror Polish Stone Wash + Sandblasted and Brushed (green handle)
Lock type
Button Lock
Out-the-front Automatic (Double-Action)
Opening method
Unknown
Thumb slide
Clip type
Tip-Up, Left/Right
Large bent steel clip
Use case profile
Best for
EDC KnivesLightweight And Durable UseAffordable And Reliable Folding Knife
Everyday CarryTactical UseCompact CarryFast Deployment Use
Not best for
Unknown
Heavy Duty PryingChoppingCarvingTasks Requiring Robust Blade Thickness
Common praise
Lightweight Yet Durable Aluminum HandleReliable Button Lock With Spring TensionAffordable Price Point Under $100Smooth Opening Due To Ceramic BearingsGood Balance Of Blade Steel Quality (14c28n) And Price
Compact And Lightweight For An Automatic KnifeExceptionally Fast And Reliable Out The Front DeploymentHigh Quality M390/d2 Steel Blades With Good Edge RetentionDurable Cnc Machined Aluminum Handle With Quality AnodizingTactical And EDC Versatile Blade Options Including Tanto And Drop Point
Common complaints
Blade Length Could Be Longer
Blade Thickness And Size Not Suitable For Heavy Duty UseHandle Surface Finish Can Scratch EasilyLarge Pocket Clip May Be Bulky
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online