← Back

Comparison Console

CIVIVI Riffle vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative. CIVIVI Riffle stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

CIVIVI Riffle stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

CIVIVI Riffle stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI Riffle stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI Riffle stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CIVIVI Riffle — Blade length: 88 mm (3.46 in)CIVIVI Riffle — Overall length: 202.7 mm (7.98 in)CIVIVI Riffle — Closed length: 114.7 mm (4.52 in)CIVIVI Riffle — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)CIVIVI Riffle — Weight: 95.7 g (3.38 oz)CIVIVI Riffle — Retail price: US$42.99Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$42.99Cheapest
US$43.99Most expensive
Weight
95.7 g (3.38 oz)Heaviest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
88 mm (3.46 in)Longest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Shortest
Overall length
202.7 mm (7.98 in)Longest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Shortest
Closed length
114.7 mm (4.52 in)Longest
105 mm (4.13 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
Sandvik 14C28N
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Dark Green Micarta
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Gray Stonewashed
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Flipper
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Tip-Up, side to side reversible stainless steel pocket clip
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday Carry (EDC)Ambidextrous opening
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
!Heavy duty chopping or survival tasks
Unknown
Common praise
Smooth caged ceramic ball bearing pivot for easy openingComfortable Micarta handle with chamfered edgesLightweight and balanced design with milled cut outs
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Not designed for heavy or tactical useNo assisted opening feature
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online