← Back

Comparison Console

CIVIVI Mini Sandbar vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CIVIVI Mini Sandbar stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CIVIVI Mini Sandbar stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CIVIVI Mini Sandbar stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CIVIVI Mini Sandbar stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CIVIVI Mini Sandbar stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CIVIVI Mini Sandbar — Blade length: 75 mm (2.95 in)CIVIVI Mini Sandbar — Overall length: 177 mm (6.97 in)CIVIVI Mini Sandbar — Closed length: 102 mm (4.02 in)CIVIVI Mini Sandbar — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)CIVIVI Mini Sandbar — Weight: 75.9 g (2.68 oz)CIVIVI Mini Sandbar — Retail price: US$51.12Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$51.12Most expensive
US$43.99Cheapest
Weight
75.9 g (2.68 oz)Lightest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
75 mm (2.95 in)Shortest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Longest
Overall length
177 mm (6.97 in)Shortest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Longest
Closed length
102 mm (4.02 in)Shortest
105 mm (4.13 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
Nitro-V
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
G-10 Laminate
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Satin
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Unknown
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Titanium Deep Carry Pocket Clip
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday CarryCompact CarryUsers looking for a slicey blade with good ergonomics
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Great ergonomicsSlicey blade with unique shapeReliable Nitro-V steelSmooth action with caged ball bearingsCompact and lightweight
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Discontinued productCan be a little short handle for larger hands
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online