← Back

Comparison Console

CIVIVI Tranquil vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CIVIVI Tranquil stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

CIVIVI Tranquil stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 34% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI Tranquil stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 21% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI Tranquil stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CIVIVI Tranquil — Blade length: 94 mm (3.70 in)CIVIVI Tranquil — Overall length: 220.9 mm (8.70 in)CIVIVI Tranquil — Closed length: 126.9 mm (5.00 in)CIVIVI Tranquil — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)CIVIVI Tranquil — Weight: 121.6 g (4.29 oz)CIVIVI Tranquil — Retail price: US$48.75Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$48.75Most expensive
US$43.99Cheapest
Weight
121.6 g (4.29 oz)Heaviest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
94 mm (3.70 in)Longest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Shortest
Overall length
220.9 mm (8.70 in)Longest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Shortest
Closed length
126.9 mm (5.00 in)Longest
105 mm (4.13 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
14C28N
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
G-10 Laminate
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Satin Finished (for C23027-1), Black (for C23027-3 and C23027-DS1)
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Flipper and Thumb Stud
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Tip-Up, Left/Right
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday Carry (EDC)
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Good blade steel 14C28NFunctional and stylish designGood handle material G10Reliable liner lock mechanism
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Discontinued modelNo explicit known complaints in provided sources
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online