← Back

Comparison Console

CIVIVI Wyvern vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CIVIVI Wyvern stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CIVIVI Wyvern stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 32% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CIVIVI Wyvern stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI Wyvern stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CIVIVI Wyvern stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CIVIVI Wyvern — Blade length: 88 mm (3.46 in)CIVIVI Wyvern — Overall length: 201 mm (7.91 in)CIVIVI Wyvern — Closed length: 113 mm (4.45 in)CIVIVI Wyvern — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)CIVIVI Wyvern — Weight: 85 g (3.00 oz)CIVIVI Wyvern — Retail price: US$58Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$58Most expensive
US$43.99Cheapest
Weight
85 g (3.00 oz)Lightest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
88 mm (3.46 in)Longest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Shortest
Overall length
201 mm (7.91 in)Longest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Shortest
Closed length
113 mm (4.45 in)Longest
105 mm (4.13 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
D2
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Fiber-glass Reinforced Nylon
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Black Stonewashed or Satin
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Flipper
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
6AL4V Titanium Tip-Up, Right Carry
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
EDC KnivesCamping KnivesHunting KnivesTactical Knives
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Smooth operation with caged ceramic ball bearing pivotGood edge retention from D2 steelLightweight and comfortable FRN handleAffordable quality EDC knife
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
D2 steel is not stainless and requires maintenance to prevent rustFRN handle may feel less premium compared to other materialsLiner lock less robust than frame locks for heavy use
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online