Comparison Console
Cold Steel 4-Max Scout vs Cold Steel Bowie Bushman
EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Cold Steel Bowie Bushman stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative. Cold Steel Bowie Bushman stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 84% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Cold Steel Bowie Bushman stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 84% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel 4-Max Scout stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 542% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel Bowie Bushman stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel 4-Max Scout stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel 4-Max Scout stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 42% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel Bowie Bushman stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 71% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel 4-Max Scout stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel Bowie Bushman stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$122Most expensive
US$18.99Cheapest
Weight
290 g (10.23 oz)Heaviest
286.3 g (10.10 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
104 mm (4.09 in)Shortest
177.8 mm (7.00 in)Longest
Overall length
255 mm (10.04 in)Shortest
311.15 mm (12.25 in)Longest
Closed length
153 mm (6.02 in)
Unknown
Blade thickness
4.8 mm (0.19 in)Thickest
2.5 mm (0.10 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
AUS-10A stainless steel
SK-5 High Carbon Steel
Handle material
Griv-Ex with stainless steel liners and Griv-Ex backspacer
SK-5 High Carbon Steel (hollow handle)
Finish
Stonewashed black finish
Black matte anti-corrosion coating
Lock type
Tri-Ad lock
Fixed
Opening method
Thumb Stud
Unknown
Clip type
Tip-up pocket clip (right side)
Unknown
Use case profile
Best for
Heavy Duty Everyday CarryJob Site UseUtility Tasks
SurvivalBushcraftOutdoor HuntingSkinningChoppingThrowing
Not best for
Unknown
Detailed CarvingLightweight EDC
Common praise
Very Strong And Durable DesignReliable Tri Ad LockGood Balance Of Size And Weight For Heavy UseGood Handle Grip And Materials
Extremely Durable Due To Integral One Piece ConstructionRazor Sharp And Suitable For A Variety Of Cutting TasksVersatile Hollow Handle For Survival Gear Storage Or Spear MountingIncludes Durable Sheath With Integrated Fire SteelGood Value For The PriceReliable And Well Made Outdoor Tool
Common complaints
Unknown
Sheath Durability Issues Reported By Some UsersNot Ideal For Carving Due To Blade GeometryToo Thin For Heavy Splitting TasksLimited Utility As A Lightweight EDC Knife
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online