Comparison Console
Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite vs Kershaw Cryo II
EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative. Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 60% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 60% gap from the closest alternative.
Kershaw Cryo II stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 147% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.
Kershaw Cryo II stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.
Kershaw Cryo II stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.
Kershaw Cryo II stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$31.99Cheapest
US$79Most expensive
Weight
136 g (4.80 oz)Lightest
156 g (5.50 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
89 mm (3.50 in)Longest
83 mm (3.27 in)Shortest
Overall length
213 mm (8.39 in)Longest
197 mm (7.76 in)Shortest
Closed length
124 mm (4.88 in)Longest
112 mm (4.41 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.8 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
3 mm (0.12 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
8Cr13MoV
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon (GFN)
Stainless steel
Finish
Satin
Titanium carbo-nitride coating on blade and handle (Gray or BlackWash)
Lock type
Rocker lock with secondary safety (variation of back lock, not Tri-Ad)
Frame lock with lockbar stabilizer
Opening method
Thumb Stud
SpeedSafe assisted (flipper or thumbstud)
Clip type
Ambidextrous 2-position pocket clip (tip up, reversible left/right)
4-position deep-carry (right/left; tip-up/down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday Carry (EDC)Budget Friendly Utility CuttingGeneral Purpose Outdoor Use
Everyday CarryWorkTactical Use
Not best for
Heavy Batonning Or Abuse Beyond Design Limits
Unknown
Common praise
Ergonomic Handle Contouring And Comfortable GripSolid Build Quality For The PriceAmbidextrous Carry And Opening CapabilitySmooth Operation After Initial Break In And MaintenanceUseful Locking Mechanism With Secondary Safety
Sturdy And Aesthetically Pleasing DesignReliable Frame Lock With Lockbar StabilizerSmooth, Fast Speedsafe Assisted OpeningComfortable Handle With Secure GripDeep Carry Reversible Pocket Clip For Versatile Carry
Common complaints
Lock Can Be Stiff And Tricky To Disengage SafelyRequires Two Hands To Close Safely Due To Lock Design And Absence Of Finger ChoilNon Deep Carry Pocket Clip Can Wear Pocket FabricSome Roughness On Handle Edges Noted On Early Versions
Heavier Weight Compared To Some Alternatives (~156g)Some Users Find The Factory Edge Out Of The Box Less Than OptimalSlick Blade Coating May Be Slippery With Dirty HandsAssisted Opening Tuning Less Optimal For Thumb Stud Use
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online