Comparison Console
Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite vs Kershaw Fatback
EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Kershaw Fatback stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative. Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.
Kershaw Fatback stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.
Kershaw Fatback stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.
Kershaw Fatback stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.
Kershaw Fatback stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.
Cold Steel Bush Ranger Lite stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$31.99Cheapest
US$43.99Most expensive
Weight
136 g (4.80 oz)Heaviest
102 g (3.60 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
89 mm (3.50 in)
89 mm (3.50 in)
Overall length
213 mm (8.39 in)Longest
197 mm (7.76 in)Shortest
Closed length
124 mm (4.88 in)Longest
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.8 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
3.75 mm (0.15 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
8Cr13MoV
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon (GFN)
Glass-filled nylon
Finish
Satin
Black-oxide coating
Lock type
Rocker lock with secondary safety (variation of back lock, not Tri-Ad)
Liner Lock
Opening method
Thumb Stud
Assisted opening with flipper
Clip type
Ambidextrous 2-position pocket clip (tip up, reversible left/right)
4-position deep-carry (right/left; tip-up/down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry (EDC)Budget-friendly utility cuttingGeneral-purpose outdoor use
Everyday carryTactical use
Not best for
Heavy batonning or abuse beyond design limits
Unknown
Common praise
Ergonomic handle contouring and comfortable gripSolid build quality for the priceAmbidextrous carry and opening capabilitySmooth operation after initial break-in and maintenanceUseful locking mechanism with secondary safety
Good grip due to aggressive texturingReliable assisted openingVersatile ambidextrous pocket clip positionsAffordable price
Common complaints
Lock can be stiff and tricky to disengage safelyRequires two hands to close safely due to lock design and absence of finger choilNon-deep carry pocket clip can wear pocket fabricSome roughness on handle edges noted on early versions
Unknown
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online