← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT Facet Viral vs Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CRKT Facet Viral stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 64% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CRKT Facet Viral stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 62% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CRKT Facet Viral stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 64% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 175% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 45% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CRKT Facet Viral stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 81% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CRKT Facet Viral stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT Facet Viral — Blade length: 89 mm (3.50 in)CRKT Facet Viral — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)CRKT Facet Viral — Closed length: 196 mm (7.72 in)CRKT Facet Viral — Weight: 28.35 g (1.00 oz)CRKT Facet Viral — Retail price: US$275Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Blade length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Overall length: 183 mm (7.20 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Weight: 77.99 g (2.75 oz)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Retail price: US$169.95Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$275Most expensive
US$169.95Cheapest
Weight
28.35 g (1.00 oz)Lightest
77.99 g (2.75 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
89 mm (3.50 in)Longest
81 mm (3.19 in)Shortest
Overall length
197 mm (7.76 in)Longest
183 mm (7.20 in)Shortest
Closed length
196 mm (7.72 in)Longest
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
Unknown
Unknown
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
Böhler M390
VG-10 Stainless Steel
Handle material
Anodized titanium
Blue Almite anodized aluminum with steel liners and backspacer
Finish
Laser-engraved viral fractal pattern on titanium scales
Satin
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Flipper with IKBS bearings-guided action
Thumb Hole
Clip type
Tip-up (right)
Reversible steel pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
EDC enthusiasts seeking premium materialsCollectors of limited edition knivesUsers desiring lightweight titanium handle with high-end steel blade
Everyday CarryCollector
Not best for
!Those preferring assisted opening mechanism!Users needing stainless steel handles
Unknown
Common praise
Premium materials and build qualityLightweight titanium handleSmooth IKBS bearings openingUnique laser-engraved handle designLimited production enhancing collectibility
High-quality VG-10 steel bladeCompact and light design at 2.75 oz.Collector's favorite with limited production
Common complaints
Lacks assisted opening mechanism of original FacetSome users may prefer frame lock over liner lockLimited availability due to small production run
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online